: “By today’s definition she was both racist and sexist and she was a complete snob who looked down on working-class people. But kids don’t think about all that, it sails over their heads.” That view is manifestly preposterous. Young people today are more fair-minded than any other previous generations. That was why, in March 2021, six of the globally popularIn playgrounds I’ve heard “fat” and “ugly” used as weapons to hurt and exclude fellow pupils.
People offended by these developments always accuse the woke of being too easily offended. Funny that. Many are nostalgic and want to hang on to lost childhoods and youth. I get that, being very old. But time moves, societies perpetually shift, our understanding of the world evolves, values are transformed. There can be no progress without that dynamism. Oldies who seek to trap their young and replicate the past need to grow up.
Bestselling children’s author Jacqueline Wilson believes modernising classic stories with sensitivity keeps them relevant: “I’m sure the same will happen with some of my earlier books as times change.” Most young parents today have an inclusive and woke mindset. Publishers are mindful of that market. An argument that was well made on Twitter by one Michael Walker, who: “The Roald Dahl controversy seems stupid. It’s not censorship, it’s a publisher recognising that people care about what values books imbue to their kids and so they’re modifying originals to make the reprints more sellable. It’s about sales not cancel culture.
y_alibhai ipaperviews Some people are fat. The end.
y_alibhai ipaperviews This is doing wonders for the sales of Roald Dahl books. The plan is working!
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
United Kingdom Latest News, United Kingdom Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Rishi Sunak Condemns Decision To Rewrite Roald Dahl Books For Modern Readers'When it comes to our rich and varied literary heritage, the prime minister agrees with the BFG, you shouldn’t gobblefunk around with words.'
Source: HuffPostUK - 🏆 108. / 51 Read more »
Roald Dahl: Rishi Sunak joins criticism of changes to author's booksA debate rages over changes to references to characters' appearance and weight in the author's works. Let's remove references to Nazis in second world war novels while we're at it. this is fucking ridiculous No it doesn’t
Source: BBCNews - 🏆 3. / 97 Read more »
Rishi Sunak slams 'airbrushed' Roald Dahl novels as he warns against 'gobblefunking' with booksRishi Sunak has waded into an ongoing row about the rewriting of treasured Roald Dahl books, warning that “it’s important that works of fiction are preserved and not airbrushed”
Source: i newspaper - 🏆 8. / 89 Read more »
Why the removal of language deemed offensive from Roald Dahl books has sparked a censorship rowThe decision to remove hundreds of examples of language that could be deemed offensive in the latest editions of Roald Dahl’s works has provoked a furious row, with the author’s publishers accused of censorship 📚 adamsherwin10 explains
Source: i newspaper - 🏆 8. / 89 Read more »
Roald Dahl: Rishi Sunak joins criticism of changes to author's booksA debate rages over changes to references to characters' appearance and weight in the author's works. Ridiculous. World gone mad. Where will it end! Woke society 😡😡 Re-writing history to suit themselves.
Source: BBCLookNorth - 🏆 37. / 67 Read more »
Why Rewrites to Roald Dahl’s Books Are Stirring ControversyThe publisher of Dahl's books has removed language from the British author's works deemed racist and sexist. I know other people love RoaldDahl books, but I am uneasy with some of the language and stereotypes. Yet I believe it is better to leave the texts as they are so we don't make his image something it wasn't - he wasn't a sweet old man and he'd hate word theft like this, surely? Down the ol memory hole Why not publish two versions, one with original texts and the other with rewrites. Wouldn't that make everyone happy? No need to pursue political correctness on everything
Source: TIME - 🏆 93. / 53 Read more »