Supreme Court rules for police in two lawsuits claiming excessive force

  • 📰 NBCNews
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 37 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 18%
  • Publisher: 86%

United States Headlines News

United States Latest News,United States Headlines

US Supreme Court rules that police officers in two cases should be shielded from lawsuits claiming their conduct killed one man and injured another.

ruled Monday that police officers in two cases should be shielded from lawsuits claiming their conduct killed one man and injured another.

After three officers responded, Rollice refused to leave the garage and grabbed a hammer. He raised it over his head and took a stance as if he was about throw it, according to court documents. Two of the officers fired their guns, killing him.In the California case, police from Union City responded to a 911 call from a 12-year-old girl who said her mother's boyfriend, Ramon Cortesluna, was in the house with a chainsaw.

In both cases, the Supreme Court said the officers were entitled to the form of legal protection known as qualified immunity. That judicial doctrine shields officers from lawsuits unless it can be shown that their conduct violated a clearly established right under the Constitution or the law.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

Two tiered justice system. When there is a person in our society that is IMMUNE that completely shreds the constitution.

congress makes the laws of our land/. the scotus just needs to enforce them all/.their injustice to all of voters objections in their gop corrupt rulings like roe verus wade which has been our law for 50 years,but due to corrupt scotus that is no longer fair & equal justice/.

Police are being shot everyday now. Have you noticed?

Fascism marches on led by the Roberts court

Wtf

The Supreme Court is illegitimate. The decisions are ideological, not legal.

The police are court officers and the American justice system is incapable of fairly judging itself.

Agreed, police officers aren't trained properly and it varies from state to state. Roads are different, weather is different, and people are different. So we can't call police criminals, they defend the constitution still. I just believe that police should be appointed by mayors.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 10. in US

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

U.S. Supreme Court again protects police accused of excessive forceThe U.S. Supreme Court on Monday granted requests by police officers in separate cases from California and Oklahoma for legal protection under a doctrine called 'qualified immunity' from lawsuits accusing them of using excessive force. The justices overturned a lower court's decision allowing a trial in a lawsuit against officers Josh Girdner and Brandon Vick over the fatal shooting of a hammer-wielding man in Tahlequah, Oklahoma. jeffgoldesq 👎 Danger
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »

Supreme Court Backs Qualified Immunity For Cops Accused Of Excessive ForceI'm a British-born reporter covering breaking news for Forbes. Reach me: jmcevoyforbes.com Surprise. Not. Explain this to me like I'm a 5th grader. ... When it is proven, and without a doubt, that a police officer used unnecessary and excessive force....they/he/she is above the law? Does that sound about right. No, I mean, does THAT sound right?
Source: Forbes - 🏆 394. / 53 Read more »

Supreme Court sides with police officers seeking 'qualified immunity' in two use-of-force casesPolice-reform advocates have called for an end to qualified immunity, arguing it insulates officers from accountability for wrongdoing.
Source: CNBC - 🏆 12. / 72 Read more »

The secret Supreme Court: Late nights, courtesy votes and the unwritten 6-vote ruleIn an expansive interview with CNN, Justice Stephen Breyer opened the door -- ever so slightly -- on some of the Supreme Court's internal customs, including on death penalty cases and midnight orders. No one cares. Have you actually looked at your ratings? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 StopCommunalAttack SaveHindus SaveHinduTemples WeWantJustice SaveMinorityHindu HumanRightsViolations WeDemandSafety WeDemandJustice SaveBangladeshiHindus SaveHindus SaveHinduTemples I can see Stephen Breyer in Rosemary's Baby looking down at Mia Farrow's devil baby and smiling.
Source: CNN - 🏆 4. / 95 Read more »

Opinion | Supreme Court term limits wouldn’t solve anythingLifetime tenure is a strength of the high court. Ending that would do more harm than good. The SCOTUS lost legitimacy when 3 seats were stolen and autocrat enablers installed. Time to play hardball POTUS Hot take from a Bezos owned news outlet talking about how reforming a corporation friendly Supreme Court wouldn't solve anything
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »

Iran court upholds jail term for UK-Iranian aid worker, lawyer saysAn Iranian appeals court has upheld a one-year prison term for British-Iranian aid worker Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe on security offences, her lawyer was quoted by an Iranian news website as saying on Saturday.
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »