The Supreme Court on Monday first ruled on a case in which police in Union City, California, responded to a 911 call alleging Ramon Cortesluna was going to hurt his girlfriend and her two children, who were trapped in another room of her home.
Cortesluna sued, arguing Rivas-Villegas used excessive force in violation of the Fourth Amendment. A federal district court sided with the officer, but the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed that decision, ruling that "existing precedent put [Rivas-Villegas] on notice that his conduct constituted excessive force."
The other case involved a 2016 police incident in which the ex-wife of Dominic Rollice told 911 that her former husband was drunk in her garage and refusing to leave. Rollice's estate sued alleging that the officers violated his Fourth Amendment right to be free from excessive force. The district court found the use of force was reasonable and that qualified immunity applied.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
U.S. Supreme Court again protects police accused of excessive forceThe U.S. Supreme Court on Monday granted requests by police officers in separate cases from California and Oklahoma for legal protection under a doctrine called 'qualified immunity' from lawsuits accusing them of using excessive force. The justices overturned a lower court's decision allowing a trial in a lawsuit against officers Josh Girdner and Brandon Vick over the fatal shooting of a hammer-wielding man in Tahlequah, Oklahoma. jeffgoldesq 👎 Danger
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »
Supreme Court Backs Qualified Immunity For Cops Accused Of Excessive ForceI'm a British-born reporter covering breaking news for Forbes. Reach me: jmcevoyforbes.com Surprise. Not. Explain this to me like I'm a 5th grader. ... When it is proven, and without a doubt, that a police officer used unnecessary and excessive force....they/he/she is above the law? Does that sound about right. No, I mean, does THAT sound right?
Source: Forbes - 🏆 394. / 53 Read more »
Opinion | Supreme Court term limits wouldn’t solve anythingLifetime tenure is a strength of the high court. Ending that would do more harm than good. The SCOTUS lost legitimacy when 3 seats were stolen and autocrat enablers installed. Time to play hardball POTUS Hot take from a Bezos owned news outlet talking about how reforming a corporation friendly Supreme Court wouldn't solve anything
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »
The secret Supreme Court: Late nights, courtesy votes and the unwritten 6-vote ruleIn an expansive interview with CNN, Justice Stephen Breyer opened the door -- ever so slightly -- on some of the Supreme Court's internal customs, including on death penalty cases and midnight orders. No one cares. Have you actually looked at your ratings? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 StopCommunalAttack SaveHindus SaveHinduTemples WeWantJustice SaveMinorityHindu HumanRightsViolations WeDemandSafety WeDemandJustice SaveBangladeshiHindus SaveHindus SaveHinduTemples I can see Stephen Breyer in Rosemary's Baby looking down at Mia Farrow's devil baby and smiling.
Source: CNN - 🏆 4. / 95 Read more »
Iran court upholds jail term for UK-Iranian aid worker, lawyer saysAn Iranian appeals court has upheld a one-year prison term for British-Iranian aid worker Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe on security offences, her lawyer was quoted by an Iranian news website as saying on Saturday.
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »
British-Iranian aid worker Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe loses court appealBritish-Iranian aid worker Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe has lost an appeal on her case in Iran, her lawyer said on Saturday.
Source: CNN - 🏆 4. / 95 Read more »