Supreme Court could still overturn Pennsylvania mail-in ballot deadline extension after election

Supreme Court could still overturn Pennsylvania mail-in ballot deadline extension after election

10/29/2020 3:56:00 PM

Supreme Court could still overturn Pennsylvania mail-in ballot deadline extension after election

The U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday declined to fast track an appeal by Pennsylvania Republicans who oppose a three-day extension of the deadline for mail ballots to be received by election authorities -- but the case could still be decided after Election Day, Justice Samuel Alito wrote in a statement conceding 'there is simply not enough time' to issue a pre-election decision.

, Justice Samuel Alito wrote in a statement conceding "there is simply not enough time" to issue a pre-election decision.The court's refusal to issue a fast-track decision does not mean it won't rule in the case. The petition asking for the court's review remains before the justices.

Space Station Crew Discusses the Meaning of Thanksgiving on Orbit 'Why now?' Dismay as US considers troop pullout from Somalia Sudan's last democratically elected prime minister dies of Covid-19

Therefore, the move sets up a scenario where the U.S. Supreme Court could step in to overturn the ballot extension, which was issued by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in a ruling that essentially changed state election law, and void votes after they have been counted in a state that has the potential to decide the presidential election. 

"It would be highly desirable to issue a ruling on the constitutionality of the State Supreme Court’s decision before the election," Alito said in a statement issued along with the Supreme Court's decision not to grant expedited review in the case Republican Party of Pennsylvania v. Boockvar. "That question has national importance, and there is a strong likelihood that the State Supreme Court decision violates the Federal Constitution."

But, Alito said, there's isn't time "at this late date to decide the question before the election." He was joined in his statement by Justices Neil Gorsuch and Clarence Thomas. In this March 7, 2019, file photo, Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito testifies before House Appropriations Committee on Capitol Hill in Washington. Alito Wednesday said it is "likely" a Pennsylvania Supreme Court decision extending the deadline for election authorities to receive ballots is unconstitutional. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh, File)

SCOTUS WON'T FAST-TRACK APPEAL OVER BLOCKING EXTENDED DEADLINE FOR PA MAIL-IN BALLOTSAlito added: "Although the Court denies the motion to expedite, the petition for certiorari remains before us, and if it is granted, the case can then be decided under a shortened schedule."

Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh Shapiro, a Democrat who supports the ballot deadline extension, said it is good that voters "will not have the rules changed on them on the eve of the election." But he acknowledged, "We know this fight may not be over and we are prepared."

Shapiro added that to ensure their ballots are received before Election Day, voters with mail ballots should use drop boxes or bring their ballots to county election offices, rather than putting them in the mail. Meanwhile, Pennsylvania Republican Party Chairman Lawrence Tabas lauded Alito for his statement "which reinforces our assertion that the U.S. Constitution gives state legislatures, not state courts, authority to govern federal elections," and therefore it's "likely" the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's decision is unconstitutional.

Norway ice melt reveals 'frozen archive' of ancient reindeer-hunting arrows Separated from loved ones for months, nursing home residents face even lonelier holidays during the coronavirus pandemic Cyclone uproots trees, floods streets in southern India

Tabas also noted a decision by the state Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar to segregate ballots received after Election Day but before the end of the three-day deadline extension. According to the guidance issued by Boockvar, published byCBS 21in Harrisburg, county elections boards "shall not pre-canvass or canvass" ballots received during the extended deadline between 8 p.m. Tuesday and 5 p.m. Friday. 

It's unclear whether Wednesday's ruling would cause Boockvar to change the guidance not to count the ballots received during the extended deadline period. But nevertheless with the ballots segregated those votes could be discounted if the U.S. Supreme Court rules the deadline extension unconstitutional. 

Ballots received during the extended deadline time period still must be sent on or before Election Day.  Read more: Fox News »

73 Questions With Yara Shahidi: Grown-ish, James Baldwin, and Bucket List Goals

At just 20, Shahidi has already distinguished herself as an actress, model and activist.

Imagine if we had a functioning US Post Office then they would all be on time. I am making $120 per hour working online on my laptop among my family. I continue doing work in my room talking to them. Its too easy to complete it no experience or skill required. You just neved internet connection and PC/Laptop. For more information visit…….   here⇢⇢⇢►  www. worknet8 .comⓇ

why would they - America is supposed to be a democracy? Why would you refuse to count timely mailed votes after Trump tried to hobble USPS?

With Barrett seated, Republicans push for Supreme Court hearing of Pennsylvania voting caseWith Amy Coney Barrett now seated on the Supreme Court, Republicans are pushing for reconsideration of a Pennsylvania case on mail-in voting -- the first potential test of how the new justice will handle election challenges. Great :( They disgust me, they know they can't win fair and square

Supreme Court won't expedite latest GOP challenge to Pennsylvania mail-in ballot rulesThe Supreme Court won't expedite the latest GOP challenge to Pennsylvania mail-in ballot rules He can thank Coney Barrett for recusing herself. guys don't start celebrating too early, in Alito's statement he says 'In addition, the Court’s denial of the motion to expedite is not a denial of a request for this Court to order that ballots received after election day be segregated so that if the State Supreme Court’s...

Supreme Court denies fast, new look at Pennsylvania ballot deadlineThe Supreme Court says it will not grant a quick, preelection review to a new Republican appeal to exclude Pennsylvania absentee ballots received after Election Day. Looks like they are done with kavanaugh Who paid off his house and sports ticket debt? RemoveKavanaugh KavanaughisCompromised I don't get why this is even a thing. Why are we extending our voting deadlines? It's like these people don't understand why a deadline is important. We've had more than enough time to turn in our ballots and more time than usual to go to the polls to vote. Why 3 more days?

Supreme Court turns down GOP appeals to limit time for mail ballots in North Carolina, PennsylvaniaN.C. Republicans said the state legislature, not state election board, sets the rules for elections. If Democratics win the election and senate they absolutely must do as the Republicans have done and move aggressively, with thought for the long term, and EXPAND. THE. SUPREME. COURT. SupremeCourt With the comfirmations of party hacks like Kavanaugh and Barrette, Its time for the Democrats to hit the ground running+ take the gloves off with this party that operates from the notion of 'Steal it if its not glued down'. SupremeCourt HappyHalloween2020 LockHimUp2021

U.S. Supreme Court deals blow to Republicans in Pennsylvania, N.Carolina vote-by-mail fightsThe U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday dealt setbacks to Republicans by allowing extended deadlines for receiving mail-in ballots in next Tuesday's election in Pennsylvania and North Carolina, states pivotal to President Donald Trump's re-election chances. It’s done. Why does this even have to be ruled upon? Why don’t republicans want your votes to be counted? Another Gore v Bush on the making

Supreme Court Allows Ballot Extensions In Pennsylvania, North Carolina, For NowJUST IN: The Supreme Court, in separate decisions, allowed North Carolina and Pennsylvania to extend their dates to count mail-in ballots. Justice Amy Coney Barrett did not participate in either case. The “Just In” boat left hours ago. You missed it. PA decision didn’t close the door completely on it. The Supreme Court left open the possibility of revisiting the situation after the election but before certification I live in a state where one candidate is going to win by 20+ points and my vote still counts cuz run it up baby! Let there be no doubt!