Johnson & Johnson Appeal Of $2 Billion Talc Verdict Rejected By Supreme Court

in favor of women who claim they developed ovarian cancer from using Johnson & Johnson talc products.

The justices did not comment Tuesday in rejecting Johnson & Johnson’s appeal. The company argued that it was not treated fairly in facing one trial involving 22 cancer sufferers who came from 12 states and different backgrounds., but a state appeals court dropped two women from the suit and reduced the award to $2 billion. The jury found that the company’s talc products contain asbestos and asbestos-laced talc can cause ovarian cancer. The company disputes both points.

Justices Samuel Alito and Brett Kavanaugh took no part in the court’s action. Alito owns $15,000 to $50,000 in Johnson & Johnson stock. Kavanaugh’s father headed the trade association that lobbied against labeling talc a carcinogen and including a warning label on talc products. Ethicists contacted by The Associated Press said they did not think E. Edward Kavanaugh’s role required his son to step aside from the case.

Johnson & Johnson, which is based in New Brunswick, New Jersey, has stopped selling its iconic talc-based Johnson’s Baby Powder in the U.S. and Canada, though it remains on the market elsewhere.

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Supreme Court rejects Johnson & Johnson’s appeal of $2 billion baby-powder verdictThe company argued that it was not treated fairly in facing one trial involving 22 cancer sufferers who came from 12 states and different backgrounds.
Source: MarketWatch - 🏆 3. / 97 Read more »

Supreme Court declines to hear Johnson & Johnson appeal of talcum powder caseThe Supreme Court has declined to hear an appeal by Johnson & Johnson that claimed they did not receive a fair trial during a lawsuit from multiple women who claimed a link between their talcum powder products and cancer. NBC's Pete Williams has details.
Source: MSNBC - 🏆 469. / 51 Read more »

U.S. Supreme Court rebuffs J&J appeal over $2 billion baby powder judgmentThe U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday declined to hear Johnson & Johnson's (JNJ.N) bid to overturn a $2.12 billion damages award to women who blamed their ovarian cancer on asbestos in the company's baby powder and other talc products. annaliesalin Good
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »

Supreme Court won't hear Johnson & Johnson's appeal of $2 billion talcum powder verdictThe company argued that it didn't get a fair trial when a jury awarded nearly $5 billion to 22 women, damages that were later reduced by more than half.
Source: NBCNewsHealth - 🏆 707. / 51 Read more »

J&J loses Supreme Court bid to appeal $2.1 billion baby powder judgmentBusiness Insider tells the global tech, finance, markets, media, healthcare, and strategy stories you want to know. It’s bunk from what I can see. 20 women wildly different symptoms/effects. No clear pattern relating to cause. Coverup in the 70’s of asbestos being mined close to talcum. Appears using that deception as case. horrible Meanwhile come get your Johnson & Johnson Covid Vaccine. Johnson & Johnson is a trustworthy company and please disregard their lawsuits on opioids and baby powder.
Source: BusinessInsider - 🏆 729. / 51 Read more »

Supreme Court rejects Johnson & Johnson’s appeal of $2 billion baby-powder verdictThe company argued that it was not treated fairly in facing one trial involving 22 cancer sufferers who came from 12 states and different backgrounds.
Source: MarketWatch - 🏆 3. / 97 Read more »