Supreme Court won't hear Johnson & Johnson's appeal of $2 billion talcum powder verdict

A state appeals court reduced the damage award to more than $2.1 billion.As is its usual practice, the Supreme Court gave no explanation for not taking the case. Two of the justices took no part in its consideration — Samuel Alito, who owns stock in the company, and Brett Kavanaugh, whose father worked for an industry lobby group.

Some of the women had a genetic or family predisposition for cancer, while others did not. Putting all the cases together confused the jury and blurred the legal distinctions separate to each claim, the company said. "The matters that were before the court are related to legal procedure, and not safety," the company said in response to the Supreme Court's order."Decades of independent scientific evaluations confirm Johnson's Baby Powder is safe, does not contain asbestos, and does not cause cancer."

, who was a member of former President Donald Trump's legal team during the first Senate impeachment trial; former U.S. Attorney General John Ashcroft, who served under President George W. Bush; and Tom Goldstein, the publisher of SCOTUSBlog who has served as an NBC News legal analyst.

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Supreme Court rejects Johnson & Johnson’s appeal of $2 billion baby-powder verdictThe company argued that it was not treated fairly in facing one trial involving 22 cancer sufferers who came from 12 states and different backgrounds.
Source: MarketWatch - 🏆 3. / 97 Read more »

Johnson & Johnson asks Supreme Court to overturn $2 billion talc product verdictJohnson & Johnson argues that the company didn't get a fair shake in a trial in state court in Missouri that resulted in an initial $4.7 billion verdict in... With a verified gmail account,Computer or even a smartphone you can earn (0.12)€5000 within 24hrs ,ask me how with the name of your country.Or kindly send me a message Sofiakingston_ Just because they made a covid vaccine now they think they can get away with crime in favor. Bet their vaccines are poisonous too watch out 👀 Companies get all the free speech they want and yet never go to jail.
Source: MarketWatch - 🏆 3. / 97 Read more »

Johnson & Johnson asks Supreme Court to void $2-billion talc verdictJohnson & Johnson wants the Supreme Court to review a $2-billion verdict in favor of women who say they developed cancer from its talc products. Really?! They knowingly put asbestos in baby powder!!! JoshMankiewicz They better not!
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »

Supreme Court declines to hear Johnson & Johnson appeal of talcum powder caseThe Supreme Court has declined to hear an appeal by Johnson & Johnson that claimed they did not receive a fair trial during a lawsuit from multiple women who claimed a link between their talcum powder products and cancer. NBC's Pete Williams has details.
Source: MSNBC - 🏆 469. / 51 Read more »

Johnson & Johnson Asks Supreme Court To Void $2 Billion Talc VerdictThe company continues to maintain that its products do not cause cancer after a state court in Missouri sided with 22 women who developed ovarian cancer.
Source: HuffPostWomen - 🏆 27. / 68 Read more »