bid to overturn a $2.12 billion damages award to women who blamed their ovarian cancer on asbestos in the company's baby powder and other talc products.
J&J said in a statement that there are unresolved legal issues that will continue to be litigated. It previously has said it faces more than 19,000 similar claims. "This was a victory not just for the amazing women and their families who we were privileged to represent, but a victory for justice," said Mark Lanier, a lawyer for the plaintiffs.The plaintiffs, nine of whom have died and are now represented by their estates, have argued that Missouri courts have jurisdiction over out-of-state claims like those brought in this litigation. One of the products that the out-of-state plaintiffs said they had used was manufactured in Missouri.
In addition to reducing the damages, the Missouri Court of Appeals dismissed two of the 17 out-of-state plaintiffs.
annaliesalin Good
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Johnson & Johnson asks high court to void $2B talc verdictWASHINGTON (AP) — Johnson & Johnson is asking for Supreme Court review of a $2 billion verdict in favor of women who claim they developed ovarian cancer from using the company's talc products. The case features an array of high-profile attorneys, some in unusual alliances, including former independent counsel Kenneth Starr, who is representing the women who sued Johnson & Johnson. My 37 year old friend died of ovarian cancer. They can 🤬 off. With how the Supreme Court is stacked now and the dollars their friends get from JJ of course they’re gonna overturn the settlement What kind of testing do they do to find the cause of ovarian cancer?
Source: AP - 🏆 728. / 51 Read more »
Johnson & Johnson asks Supreme Court to void $2-billion talc verdictJohnson & Johnson wants the Supreme Court to review a $2-billion verdict in favor of women who say they developed cancer from its talc products. Really?! They knowingly put asbestos in baby powder!!! JoshMankiewicz They better not!
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »
Johnson & Johnson asks Supreme Court to overturn $2 billion talc product verdictJohnson & Johnson argues that the company didn't get a fair shake in a trial in state court in Missouri that resulted in an initial $4.7 billion verdict in... With a verified gmail account,Computer or even a smartphone you can earn (0.12)€5000 within 24hrs ,ask me how with the name of your country.Or kindly send me a message Sofiakingston_ Just because they made a covid vaccine now they think they can get away with crime in favor. Bet their vaccines are poisonous too watch out 👀 Companies get all the free speech they want and yet never go to jail.
Source: MarketWatch - 🏆 3. / 97 Read more »
Johnson & Johnson Asks Supreme Court To Void $2 Billion Talc VerdictThe company continues to maintain that its products do not cause cancer after a state court in Missouri sided with 22 women who developed ovarian cancer.
Source: HuffPostWomen - 🏆 27. / 68 Read more »
Johnson & Johnson asks Supreme Court to void $2B talc verdictThe court could say as soon as Tuesday whether it will get involved in the case, which features high-profile attorneys, including Kenneth Starr, who is representing the women who sued. Government for corporations and death and jail sentences for everyone else. So many comments are hidden. There is absolutely no definitive proof or scientific evidence that use of baby powder cause ovarian cancer. If it were true, hundreds of millions of women would have had ovarian cancer, because J&J baby powder is used worldwide. Also, $2B verdict is just plain ridiculous.
Source: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Read more »