Matthews knew this could be coming soon, but she was still stunned. The season she was working on was all about how Roe v. Wade came into being in the first place.Credit:At the start of a meeting the next day, her editor paused for a moment, looked around the room and said, “I think I should ask something. Is everyone okay?”
The podcast looks at both sides of the debate. The second episode investigates the pro-life movement, which grew out of the work of Catholic power couple John and Barbara Wilkie. Their 1971 bookwhich became a sacred text for those against abortion, was accompanied by graphic photos of aborted foetuses. Matthews maintains her journalistic objectivity when reporting on them.
The final episode is perhaps the most surprising of all. The judicial hero of Roe v. Wade turned out not to be a left-wing crusader, but a Justice appointed by Richard Nixon because he was measured and conservative in his beliefs and rulings. He did something Matthews feels is remarkable – he read and researched and listened, then became deeply empathetic and changed his mind about something, ultimately gaining a 7-2 ruling to make abortion legal in 1973.Justice Harry Blackmun died in 1999.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Australia Latest News, Australia Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
‘Good for her, not for me’: A simple maxim for these post-Roe timesCan you imagine if any one of the six US Supreme Court justices who decided to overturn Roe v Wade had instead thought to themselves: “Good for her, not for me”? | OPINION by Amelia Lester That’s Got nothing to do with what they personally think…… it was Never in the Constitution and needed to remain so. It’s up too the individual states… like Sanctuary Cities for Eg. After taking the vac their reproductive systems are screwed anyway. You do realise this was a US legal decision. Also it overturns nothing it becomes state based just like Australia. The US Supreme Court is in the US not Australia.
Source: theage - 🏆 8. / 77 Read more »
Want to learn more about Roe v Wade? Here’s the podcast for youSlow Burn: Roe v. Wade is a stark reminder of what has been lost. In a nut shell it's feeble minded religious junkies trying to force their feeble minded views and practices upon those who look upon religion in contempt.
Source: smh - 🏆 6. / 80 Read more »
Want to learn more about Roe v Wade? Here’s the podcast for youSlow Burn: Roe v. Wade is a stark reminder of what has been lost. In a nut shell it's feeble minded religious junkies trying to force their feeble minded views and practices upon those who look upon religion in contempt.
Source: smh - 🏆 6. / 80 Read more »
‘Good for her, not for me’: A simple maxim for these post-Roe timesCan you imagine if any one of the six US Supreme Court justices who decided to overturn Roe v Wade had instead thought to themselves: “Good for her, not for me”? | OPINION by Amelia Lester That’s Got nothing to do with what they personally think…… it was Never in the Constitution and needed to remain so. It’s up too the individual states… like Sanctuary Cities for Eg. After taking the vac their reproductive systems are screwed anyway. You do realise this was a US legal decision. Also it overturns nothing it becomes state based just like Australia. The US Supreme Court is in the US not Australia.
Source: theage - 🏆 8. / 77 Read more »
Protesters at Wimbledon urge end to all-white dress code due to period concernsCampaign wants rule change to allow female players to put on coloured underwear when needed
Source: GuardianAus - 🏆 1. / 98 Read more »
I fear my parents will disapprove of my new partnerYour family wants the best for you – but may not make the best choices Not having your family when things are going to hell but sadly if your family can’t be there for you unconditionally then they probably are never really there.
Source: GuardianAus - 🏆 1. / 98 Read more »