'I respectfully dissent': Why one judge wanted to quash George Pell's convictions

  • 📰 abcnews
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 26 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 14%
  • Publisher: 83%

Australia Headlines News

Australia Latest News,Australia Headlines

When the Victorian Court of Appeal upheld George Pell's historical child abuse convictions on Wednesday, the decision was not unanimous. Here's why.

Chief Justice Ferguson and Justice Maxwell did not experience the same doubts and dismissed the appeal.

President of the Law Institute of Victoria, Stuart Webb, said it was unusual for the bench to disagree in such a case. "That two very senior judges have decided that the jury was correct … and one judge can decide no, that's not what he believes and there was grounds for reasonable doubt." "That has caused me to reflect even more carefully upon the proper outcome of this application. Having done so, however, I cannot, in good conscience, do other than to maintain my dissent."

Source: Law Daily Report (lawdailyreport.net)

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

I understand the Judges dissent. However, I remember when Wilisee? went to interview Pell before he was a Cardinal, about alleged sexual molestation of young Choir Boys. That was early 70's. Pell was the absolute rudest person in that interview. You must have tapes of Pell then.

Read the Appeals Court full judgement. It’s easy to read. Then objectively put yourself on the jury, even on the bench, then put yourself in the dock. It is fascinating outside the court of opinion or media bites. The article is poor in concluding all the Justices position.

Curious Non-lawyer asks: How is it that an Appeals Court which has a sizeable percentage of reasonable doubt within itself is able to make a clear binding decision over a jury’s ’reasonable doubt'? Happy to be educated here on our legal system.

why indeed; one would think a clear cut case would be unanimous...

Australian Court is farce sentanced Cardinal Pell without any meterial and real evidence what happen 20 years aggo, only statement of two dubious witnesses and public hear say.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 5. in AU

Australia Latest News, Australia Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

George Pell Appeal: Vatican could try Pell under church lawThe Vatican says it will let George Pell exhaust all legal avenues of appeal against his sexual abuse convictions in Australia before taking up his case in its own canon law investigation. 9News Thousands of catholic clergy have abused children, facilitated abuse by others, not reported confessions of paedophilia. It’s a centuries old curse. Why wait one second longer? Petition to sack Bolt included. I couldn't care less about the Vatican's view on this case. Canon Law...Sharia Law...Explain the difference. They will probably exonerate him .
Source: 9NewsAUS - 🏆 10. / 72 Read more »

Why the dissenting judge believed George Pell should walk freeOne of the three Court of Appeal judges who heard George Pell's appeal believes there is a 'significant possibility' the cardinal did not commit the child sex crimes he's in jail for and would have acquitted him. Just finished reading Weinberg JA dissenting opinion. It is very compelling and will result in a High Court challenge, IMO. And two didn't. Which is why he remains in jail. The other Two DISMISSED his appeal. !!!!
Source: smh - 🏆 6. / 80 Read more »

Why the dissenting judge believed George Pell should walk freeOne of the three Court of Appeal judges who heard George Pell's appeal believes there is a 'significant possibility' the cardinal did not commit the child sex crimes he's in jail for and would have acquitted him. Why focus on the dissenting judgement this way? 2 out of 3 judges agreed the complainant’s evidence was compelling. Majority verdict to deny leave to appeal. 2 out of 3 judges agreed the jury’s conviction was reasonable, given the evidence. This is what happens when you place faith in fables Yeah, cause Weinberg is a stupid shart, not worthy of his position. Which parts did he think we're embellished? Cause the other 2 judges think he's wrong.
Source: theage - 🏆 8. / 77 Read more »

George Pell appeal fails, Cardinal to serve out full jail termConvicted paedophile George Pell will serve out his prison term after Victoria’s highest court rejected his appeal on Wednesday, in a 2-1 ruling. . The dissenting judge must have been 'a powerful friend'... Strength. Justice. RT : Breaking: George Pell appeal fails, Cardinal to serve out full jail term Off to jail you go😕😠 Pedophiles dressed in long skirts😠
Source: smh - 🏆 6. / 80 Read more »

George Pell appeal LIVE stream: Watch hereWatch live: Three Court of Appeal judges are due to deliver their decision on George Pell's appeal at 9.30am. You can watch the live stream here I wonder if this convicted pedophile and career pedophile protector and enabler will be let off by judges to appease the church
Source: theage - 🏆 8. / 77 Read more »

George Pell appeal fails, Cardinal to serve out full jail termThe Court of Appeal has upheld Cardinal George Pell's child sex abuse convictions, but Pell may continue his fight to walk free. His lawyers could now take his appeal to the High Court in a final bid to have the cardinal’s convictions quashed. There is justice in the world! 🙏 Who pays for his lawyers ? And remember those who repeatedly stood up for Pell. Tony Abbott & Alan Jones. Birds of a feather.
Source: theage - 🏆 8. / 77 Read more »