Energy Minister Angus Taylor says the history of energy production has shown new technology instead of additional taxation is the best pathway to achieving a sustainable reduction in emissions. “We must follow the lessons of history and develop and then adopt new technologies to solve our hardest problems,” he said. The Energy Minister said “there are only two ways to suppress emissions.
Either through some form of taxation, or you improve the activities. There is no third way”. He went on to outline the four core principles behind his energy plan. "The first, a relentless focus on it. The second, the deployment on activity, not taxes. Third, respect for consumer choice and fourth, a goal to maintain a balance of fuel and technology sources".
Source: Energy Industry News (energyindustrynews.net)
AngusTaylorMP Please wake up Australians! People died and are dying, people are attacked by evil CCP virus! It’s bio-weapon to kill people! Please Quickly Action Action Action to Takedown the *CCP! Job ,elections,money,power, politics is no matter!
AngusTaylorMP
AngusTaylorMP
AngusTaylorMP Can we get over the emissions thing already? Tell us how you plan on getting rid of the wind turbines when they break, or the solar panels. Work that out how and where you will get rid of them and see if it is economical.
AngusTaylorMP It’s certainly the best way to launder billions of dollars of Gov’t money to private wealth funds
AngusTaylorMP auspol
AngusTaylorMP What a load of CodsWallop AngusTheShitDribbler
AngusTaylorMP Yet it will cost taxpayers more than $18B All funneled to LNP donor mates whilst big emitters keep emitting for free.
AngusTaylorMP Guardian of fossil fuel industry contributions to the LNP.
AngusTaylorMP
AngusTaylorMP Refusing to act today will destroy our economy tomorrow. Taylor and his cronies are forcing an incalculable debt onto all future generations of Australians, all so they can deliver profits to their donor mates today. It is sickening.
AngusTaylorMP How much money has his family made selling off our water?
AngusTaylorMP
AngusTaylorMP Carbon taxes from a theory and empirical perspective have been shown to be the most effective. As a Chemical Engineer that has worked on some of Australia's Startup technology, I can say 'he's dreamin' '
AngusTaylorMP I prefer energy, not the idiot; AngusTaylorMP!
AngusTaylorMP
AngusTaylorMP
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Australia Latest News, Australia Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Australia's new energy 'roadmap' to focus on specific industriesThe Federal Government is reshaping the nation's approach to reducing carbon emissions, turning the focus to backing a select few technologies and supporting heavy industry. The trouble with a 'roadmap' is they're usually out-of-date. it's crazy how far-right the ABC has become Just use coal
Source: abcnews - 🏆 5. / 83 Read more »
Government to invest $18 billion in five major technologies to cut emissions | Sky News AustraliaThe government has revealed a list of five new and emerging technologies it is planning to invest in as part of a roadmap to bring down emissions. \n\nThrough to 2030, the government said it would invest $18 billion in a bid to unlock further investment for the private sector totalling around $50 billion, and hoped to wipe out 250 million tonnes of emissions by 2040. \n\nThe five major investments included clean hydrogen, energy storage, green steel and aluminium, carbon capture and storage, and soil carbon projects\n\nEnergy Minister Angus Taylor was set to announce the map at the National Press Club later on Tuesday, where he was expected to say “Let’s be clear – there are only two ways to reduce missions”. \n\n“You either suppress emissions intensive economic activities, usually through some version of taxation – or you improve them. There is no third way,” he will say. \n\n“Australia can’t and shouldn’t damage its economy to reduce emissions.” \n\nThe move comes nearly a week after the Morrison government revealed it would broaden the remit of its key energy investment agencies and focus on low emissions technology in a shift away from funding solely wind and solar projects. \n\nThe government did not mention nuclear energy, which was deemed third stage interest. \n\n A NIGHTMARE COAL, GAS, DIESEL, BULLSHIT AND SPIN !!
Source: SkyNewsAust - 🏆 7. / 78 Read more »
Blaming Trump for climate change is ‘ironic’ given two per cent emissions reduction | Sky News AustraliaEnvironmental policy expert Michael Shellenberger says it is completely unscientific and “crazy talk” to suggest temperatures rise and forests burn because Donald Trump is the president.\n\nMr Shellenberger said it’s ironic how climate activists level blame upon President Donald Trump for climate change when emissions are “lower now than when he took office”.\n\n“They declined two per cent last year”.\n\nHe said it’s a crazy notion to suggest Donald Trump is responsible for the current Californian wildfires given it takes “30 years or more for the carbon dioxide to translate to warming”.\n\n“It’s so unscientific and yet it’s clearly been given a pass because the media has been so bias on this because they hate Trump so much,” Mr Shellenberger said.\n\n“They basically want to ascribe every natural disaster, every fire on him.\n\n“It’s really the state’s fault that you have this huge accumulation of wood fuel, Donald Trump doesn’t have anything to do with that.”\n ShellenbergerMD realDonaldTrump Even the stuff Obama did is Trump's fault. Go figure. ShellenbergerMD realDonaldTrump Says a medical doctor! ShellenbergerMD realDonaldTrump He had a degree in Peace and Global Studies BTW. He is not a scientist. Nor is he a Doctor or psychologist. For a laugh, his twitter bio says “MD = my initials”. His opinions are for sale and the Republicans, and Murdoch press, are buying
Source: SkyNewsAust - 🏆 7. / 78 Read more »
Morrison says zero emissions achievable but won't commit to targetThe Prime Minister says his government is focused on technologies that use lower emissions, but wouldn’t formally commit to a 2050 target. Covid safe app for example scottyfrommarketing make no mistake He had to run this by Newscorp first. They said no targets. What a JOKE? How can the world expect any commitment for 2050, where the Australian Government can't even plan and define 2021? BeRealistic
Source: theage - 🏆 8. / 77 Read more »
Morrison says zero emissions achievable but won't commit to targetPrime Minister Scott Morrison says Australia will achieve net zero emissions by 2050 but won’t commit to making that an explicit target | katinacurtis katinacurtis That's too little too late katinacurtis Can't help stupid, it is leading the country katinacurtis Good. Common sense.
Source: smh - 🏆 6. / 80 Read more »
Australia's new energy 'roadmap' to focus on specific industriesThe Federal Government is reshaping the nation's approach to reducing carbon emissions, turning the focus to backing a select few technologies and supporting heavy industry. The trouble with a 'roadmap' is they're usually out-of-date. it's crazy how far-right the ABC has become Just use coal
Source: abcnews - 🏆 5. / 83 Read more »