“The remedy I intend to grant is one that serves to rectify the act of unfairness complained of the premature issuing of Section 189 notices,” said Van Niekerk in his judgement. Section 189A of the Labour Relations Act permits employers to dismiss employees for operational requirements.
Van Niekerk also said nothing in the order precluded SAA and the BRPs from offering nor any employee of the company from accepting any offer of voluntary retrenchment. NUMSA spokesperson Phakamile Hlubi confirmed that the court had ruled that retrenchments could not proceed without a business rescue plan.NUMSA and SACCA filed an urgent application requesting that the court declare the Section 189 notices issued in March as unlawful.
The unions wanted the right to be considered on the government-sponsored Training Lay Off scheme, instead of being retrenched in terms of the collective agreement. They said that the retrenchment notices were issued in haste without a thorough consideration of the situation at SAA.
busrep Ok so they won. Will they now get paid end of Mei? Asking for a friend.
busrep Numsa_Media Well done✊🏿✊🏿✊🏿
busrep Numsa_Media Good job.
busrep Who will pay them with what ? Lots of people are suffering. Fuck them and the labour court
busrep Well done Numsa_Media
busrep Kiss of life you storing assemblers on a sink ship. What’s the point
busrep Not only must justice be done, it must be seen to have been done.✊. The law has taken its cause.
busrep Major strikes planned for South Africa 2019/2020
busrep Well done to Numsa_Media leadership ✊
busrep Retrenchment will proceed its just due process was not followed.. Is there another possible avenue available to save the airline.. Unless the Covid fund subsidize the embattled airline.. Or Jacob pays back the money.. Or Jesus comes.. You choose
South Africa Latest News, South Africa Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
SAA workers head to court to stop job cutsBut the business rescue practitioners are opposing the application, which Numsa and Sacca want heard on an urgent basis
Source: BDliveSA - 🏆 12. / 63 Read more »
SAA workers head to court to stop job cutsBut the business rescue practitioners are opposing the application, which Numsa and Sacca want heard on an urgent basis Dear SAA worker, if SAA was your own business,would you have retained workers and if so,to do exactly what?
Source: BDliveSA - 🏆 12. / 63 Read more »
Source: TheCitizen_News - 🏆 6. / 75 Read more »
Court halts SAA retrenchments as unions score big winThe Labour Court has ordered the business rescue practitioners of SAA to stop planned retrenchments at the stricken state-owned airline, saying a business rescue plan had to first be presented before employees were invited to consult in such a process. Didn’t Gordhan day he is working with Unions and that all is well What happened to SA? I think this is good. SAA should be treated like any other company in SA, and be subject to, and enjoy protection from, the same legislative and economic laws as other private companies. I assume all the staff will be getting UIF like everyone else. Everyone is hurting. Unions are also to blame for this mess. Sure, Dude Miyeni and Jacob Zuma are ultimately responsible but these unions facilitated this.
Source: SowetanLIVE - 🏆 13. / 63 Read more »
Source: eNCA - 🏆 49. / 51 Read more »
Gordhan slams SAA business rescuers for spending R35m on US consultantsThe government is unhappy that SAA business rescue practitioners spent between R30m and R35m on American consultants, while it has not yet seen any plan to save the national carrier from total collapse. Those are big bags We are not stupid🤮🤮 They would have charged in Dollars 💵😢we have Monopoly money so everything is expensive 😭
Source: TimesLIVE - 🏆 28. / 59 Read more »