, a group of plaintiffs in Indiana scored a notable win: A three-judge panel on the Indiana Court of Appeals agreed to enjoin Indiana ’s near-total abortion ban, as applied against a class of religious plaintiffs who had argued that the ban violates a state law protecting religious freedom. In its, authored by Judge Leanna K.
We need look no further than the language of the Abortion Law to determine that the General Assembly does not view the State’s compelling interest as beginning at fertilization. The Abortion Law exempts in vitro fertilization procedures from its scope, although there is the potential for life that might be destroyed in the process of this procedure.
With the ascendency of religious exemptions, especially in federal law, it would be natural to wonder what happened to the old-fashioned objection that abortion bans are really just an attempt by the state to impose one religious view about when life begins on others who don’t share that perspective. Even though the U.S. Supreme Court oncean argument along these lines, it has not lost its force. And in a remarkable concurring opinion, Judge L.
Given the opportunity, some ideas will not be repressed, and in Indiana, the idea that abortion is a matter of religious freedom has broken through in the lower courts. Now the question is likely to be whether the Indiana Supreme Court will affirm that religious liberty applies even when it is liberal and progressive believers who are pressing their
Supreme-Court Abortion Judiciary Indiana
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: TheOnion - 🏆 724. / 51 Read more »
Source: vmagazine - 🏆 110. / 63 Read more »
Source: usweekly - 🏆 390. / 55 Read more »
Source: Utoday_en - 🏆 295. / 63 Read more »
Source: usweekly - 🏆 390. / 55 Read more »
Source: wwd - 🏆 24. / 68 Read more »