In Justice Clarence Thomas' concurring opinion, he writes that other cases that protect the right to contraception, to same-sex marriage and to engage in private, consensual sex acts"are not at issue" in this particular decision. But he also writes that"in future cases," the court"should reconsider" the decisions in the cases that established those rights.
With Roe v. Wade overturned, there will be a patchwork of laws that make things more dangerous and more confusing for people who need abortion care, he said. The right to privacy is not explicitly mentioned in the constitution, Bae explained. But it's something that's been codified in decisions over and over again for the last several decades through the due process clause in the fifth and fourteenth amendments, Wendy Mariner, professor of health law, bioethics and human rights at Boston University School of Public Health, told TODAY in May.
The correct headline should be “Supreme Court restores abortion rights to the states “
The Supreme Court did not take away the so-called “right” to abortion - they left it up to the states and the people to decide. Isn’t that democracy?
If a white men could get pregnant, abortion clinics would be next to every homedepot. Fathers aborting their parenting should not be an option!!
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: Slate - 🏆 716. / 51 Read more »
Source: ScaryMommy - 🏆 116. / 63 Read more »
Source: Slate - 🏆 716. / 51 Read more »
Source: WBUR - 🏆 274. / 63 Read more »
Source: SpectrumNews1TX - 🏆 333. / 59 Read more »
Source: HuffPostParents - 🏆 414. / 53 Read more »