A Turkish official from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs has questioned whether the Minsk Group format is still a viable vehicle for bringing peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan.
Asked whether Turkey would like to see a more effective format than the Minsk group, the official said “definitely.”become a co-chair of the Minsk groupAliyev expressed concern that the current co-chairs were not doing enough to resolve the conflict, and that the Armenian lobby in all three countries skewed the negotiating table in favour of Yerevan’s continuing occupation of Azerberjan’s territory.
“The Kremlin is determined to hold the reigns of the group by dominating the negotiation process,” added Mammadov speaking toFresh doubt was cast on the Minsk Group’s ability to play an impartial role in de-escalating tensions when French President Emmanuel Macron seemed toWith the US in the midst of an election year and Russia seen as a natural ally to Armenia, it is logical for officials in Baku to seek a regional ally as part of the resolution process, said Mammadov.
Azerbaijan’s army has shown that Baku is ready to sustain their efforts to liberate the occupied Karabakh region.
TurkeyAzerbaijan🇦🇿🇹🇷
Traditional ceasefire when military draws exact borders on a map and specifies communication channels is absolutely impossible. It may take few months. What is possible is that Armenia declares removal from occupied territories, so no need to reach agreement on line of contact.
Can Azerbaijan understand that the condom is older than Azerbaijan?
Yeswar
no
Congratulations!!!Very well done!!! Best Wishes God blessing you all🇮🇳💕💥
if with 'resolve' you mean give putin everything he wants in exchange for empty promises sure you can resolve it like syria and libya. He is still bombing idlib, and russia controls libya.
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: TheEconomist - 🏆 6. / 92 Read more »
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »
Source: ForbesWomen - 🏆 477. / 51 Read more »
Source: Forbes - 🏆 394. / 53 Read more »
Source: AP - 🏆 728. / 51 Read more »