The Supreme Court's ruling on the ACA's birth control mandate could cost women hundreds of dollars each year

  • 📰 CNBC
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 19 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 11%
  • Publisher: 72%

United States Headlines News

United States Latest News,United States Headlines

The Supreme Court's ruling on the ACA's birth control mandate could cost women hundreds of dollars each year. (via CNBCMakeIt)

each annually, according tofrom the Department of Health and Human Services. That said, the cost of birth control varies greatly depending on the type, with longer lasting, more effective varieties like IUDs costing significantly more upfront than other types, like the pill.

The Health Affairs' study found that women saved, on average, $254.91 per year on the pill after the ACA's mandate went into effect.Guttmacher Institute"Numerous studies have demonstrated that even seemingly small cost-sharing requirements can dramatically reduce preventive health care use, particularly among lower-income Americans,"

Source: Healthcare Press (healthcarepress.net)

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

MakeIt So.

MakeIt Or it could cost them nothing

MakeIt They could choose abstinence 🤔😆🤣

MakeIt A Biden presidency WILL cost you THOUSANDS of dollars

MakeIt Propaganda

MakeIt This is why I feel we need Medicare for All.

MakeIt BCPs are $5 a month at WalMart. Cash price. Stop the hysteria.

MakeIt Oh my God, you mean they have to buy their own medication like everyone else? The horror

MakeIt Or it could NOT cost them anything.

MakeIt But only if they are working for a religious organization that has reservations about providing birth control/abortifacients. Otherwise, they can certainly work for another employer and potentially save hundreds of dollars each year.

MakeIt Cnbc, you are blocked.

MakeIt Boycott

MakeIt Who do think you’re fooling? The Pill is $9 at Walmart.

MakeIt 'could' There are a lot of things that 'could' happen Things that 'happen' are headlines, this is why I don't watch or read CNBC anymore.

MakeIt Better the them than the tax payer.

MakeIt 100% of women? Or more like 3%? Your headline reads like it’s 100%

MakeIt Yeah not sure why an employer should be required to pay for that?

MakeIt The taxpayer is required to fund gratuitous sex birth control. Get a job first boys and girls and go to Walgreens. Be responsible for yourselves. (CNBC sounds like idiots. Won't listen to their business shows anymore).

MakeIt Trash

MakeIt This is only for faith based work places! If you are a pro abortion fan! Then don't choose to work there! Freedom of choice, right you liberal hypocrites!

MakeIt Decouple employment and healthcare. Everyone deserves healthcare. MedicareForAll

MakeIt Oh boohoo It's not the employers job to supply medicine (contraception or otherwise) to their workers....

MakeIt Excellent. Tax payers not funding “her choice”.

MakeIt This is a misleading headline. This decision only applies to faith based organisations. If you don’t believe in religion, then working for a faith based organisation is not a good career choice, but of course MSM doesn’t believe in individual choice, the irony of being ProChoice

MakeIt Sounds a little like discrimination in the name of god for faux Christians.

MakeIt Not having universal healthcare costs some women (and men) 10s of thousands a year. Let's address that...if it's universal, then birth control WILL be covered.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 12. in US

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Supreme Court OKs Religious and Moral Exemptions for Birth-Control CoverageThe Supreme Court on Wednesday upheld Trump administration rules that expanded moral and religious exemptions to a federal requirement that employer-provided health-insurance plans cover birth control with no out-of-pocket costs. Cancel all erectile dysfunction medication prescriptions immediately. Especially those for the SCOTUS boys. Glorious, eh? You guys are gonna put the 'broads' firmly back in their places before Donnie gets the heave-ho....that should help the dumb white boys keep the top spots with less competition from the damn uppity women, right? “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the FREE EXERCISE thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”.
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »

Supreme Court says Trump administration can let religious employers deny birth control coverage under ObamacareSupreme Court says Trump administration can let religious employers deny birth control coverage HobbyLobby we're watching you 👀 Let’s take away more women’s rights. Let’s go to the streets Religious institutions should pay TAXES!
Source: CNBC - 🏆 12. / 72 Read more »

Supreme Court Deals Massive Blow To Birth Control AccessToday, the Supreme Court ruled against free and comprehensive access to birth control under the Affordable Care Act, a long-term project of the Religious Right and a decision that will immediately prevent hundreds of thousands of women from accessing free reproductive care. The decision upholds a Trump Administration rule that significantly weakens Obama-era regulations—regulations intended to act as a compromise between opposing sides by providing specific carve-outs for churches and religious organizations. Any attempt at common ground was obliterated with today’s ruling. Lmfaooooooooooooooo 😂😂😂 SHOCKING. SCOTUS you failed all American women today🖕🏻
Source: Jezebel - 🏆 153. / 63 Read more »

Supreme Court Says Employers Can Deny Workers Birth Control CoverageSCOTUS voted 7-2 to uphold a Trump administration regulation that allows employers with religious objections to deny their employees access to free birth control with insurance coverage under the Affordable Care Act Not just religious objections. They added “moral objections.” That basically that means any employer who is “morally opposed” to spending money they don’t want to spend can refuse to provide health services. Disgraceful fanatics shouldn't get in the way of women's health needs - these fake Christians just don't want to pay taxes
Source: NYMag - 🏆 111. / 63 Read more »

Employers Don't Have To Pay For Birth Control For Religious Reasons, Supreme Court RulesThe decision would expand the number of employers who could object on religious or moral grounds to the Affordable Care Act's birth control mandate. lisettevoytko 🤔🤔🤔 lisettevoytko If you are old enough to make decision to have sex you are old enough to pay for your own condoms lisettevoytko Fix the insurance companies or bullshit like this will always happen
Source: Forbes - 🏆 394. / 53 Read more »

The Supreme Court Made It Easier For Employers To Deny Insurance Coverage For Birth ControlThe decision watered down the Affordable Care Act's 'contraceptive mandate,' allowing employers and universities to opt out of providing health insurance coverage for contraception for religious or moral reasons. Thank God So conservatives don’t want to provide women birth control through insurance but then also won’t let them get an abortion? Cool. Make sense. This assumes morality on the business decision level. Lol. Lol. Another shit decision making heartless soul less businesses continue to pretend to be “humane”.
Source: BuzzFeed - 🏆 730. / 51 Read more »