Copyright 2024 The Associated Press All Rights Reservedon Wednesday sided with the Biden administration in a dispute with Republican-led states over how far the federal government can go to combatthat favored Louisiana, Missouri and other parties in their claims that officials in the Democratic administration leaned on the social media platforms to unconstitutionally squelch conservative points of view.
The states had argued that White House communications staffers, the surgeon general, the FBI and the U.S. cybersecurity agency are among those who applied “unrelenting pressure” to coerce changes in online content on social media platforms. The Biden administration underscored those concerns when it noted that the government would lose its ability to communicate with the social media companies about antisemitic and anti-Muslim posts, as well as on issues of national security, public health and election integrity.
Free speech advocates had urged the court to use the case to draw an appropriate line between the government’s acceptable use of the bully pulpit and coercive threats to free speech.
Source: Law Daily Report (lawdailyreport.net)
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: CBSNews - 🏆 87. / 68 Read more »
Source: WTHRcom - 🏆 329. / 59 Read more »
Source: ForbesTech - 🏆 318. / 59 Read more »
Source: FCN2go - 🏆 523. / 51 Read more »
Source: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Read more »
Source: 10TV - 🏆 560. / 51 Read more »