Supreme Court Won’t Stop Biden Administration From Working With Social Media Companies

  • 📰 ForbesTech
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 73 sec. here
  • 11 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 61%
  • Publisher: 59%

Supreme Court News

Ruling,Murthy V. Missouri,Biden Administration

Alison Durkee is a senior reporter covering breaking news, with a focus on legal issues and U.S. politics. She joined Forbes in 2020 and is based in London and New York, covering such topics as the Supreme Court, litigation against Donald Trump and clashes over abortion rights. Durkee previously covered U.S.

GOP-led states lost their bid to block the Biden administration from contacting social media companies to remove misinformation, as the Supreme Court ruled Wednesday they do not have standing to challenge the government's work with social media platforms—delivering a blow to conservatives' long-standing complaints that platforms are purportedly biased against them.

Justices ruled 6-3 the states and individuals did not have standing to bring the case, as they could not show any personal harm to them that was caused by the government’s contacts and they “fail” to show how any past restrictions they faced were directly caused by the Biden administration’s contacts.

The states argued the Biden administration’s contacts with social media platforms unfairly punished conservatives and infringed on their freedom of speech, while the government argued its conduct “poses no First Amendment concern” as long as they’re trying to “inform and persuade” social media companies rather than “compel” them to change their content.

Justice Amy Coney Barrett, writing for the court’s majority, ruled the states could not challenge the Biden administration’s contacts based on whatever harms it may have caused their residents, and noted they couldn’t show the government has applied any continued pressure on social media platforms—pointing out that networks have continued to address COVID-19 misinformation even as the federal government has “wound down its own pandemic response measures.

Justice Samuel Alito, joined by Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch, dissented from the ruling, calling the case “one of the most important free speech cases in years” and arguing the court’s majority opinion is “regrettable” because the government officials’ actions were “blatantly unconstitutional.

Source: News Formal (newsformal.com)

Ruling Murthy V. Missouri Biden Administration Social Media Companies Misinformation Freedom Of Speech Biased Against Conservatives Opinion

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 318. in US

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Oklahoma Supreme Court court rejects proposed religious public charter schoolThe state Supreme Court said the first-of-its-kind school, approved last year by the charter school board, violated the state and U.S. constitution.
Source: adndotcom - 🏆 293. / 63 Read more »

The one court that even the Supreme Court sees as going too farSteve Benen is a producer for 'The Rachel Maddow Show,' the editor of MaddowBlog and an MSNBC political contributor. He's also the bestselling author of 'The Impostors: How Republicans Quit Governing and Seized American Politics.'
Source: MSNBC - 🏆 469. / 51 Read more »

Trump campaign reacts to bump stock Supreme Court decision: ‘The court has spoken’Former President Donald Trump's campaign supported the Supreme Court's decision to strike down a Trump administration ban on 'bump stocks,' which enable semiautomatic weapons to fire rounds faster.
Source: dcexaminer - 🏆 6. / 94 Read more »

Supreme Court sides with Starbucks, makes it harder for NLRB to win court ordersThe justices tightened the standards for when a federal court should issue an order to protect the jobs of workers during a union organizing campaign.
Source: komonews - 🏆 272. / 63 Read more »

Supreme Court sends dispute over Arkansas' GOP-drawn congressional map back to lower courtLawrence Hurley covers the Supreme Court for NBC News.
Source: NBCNewsHealth - 🏆 707. / 51 Read more »

Social Media Should Have Labels Similar To Tobacco Products, Surgeon General Says—Noting ‘Significant Harm’ For TeensAlison Durkee is a senior reporter covering breaking news, with a focus on legal issues and U.S. politics. She joined Forbes in 2020 and is based in London and New York, covering such topics as the Supreme Court, litigation against Donald Trump and clashes over abortion rights. Durkee previously covered U.S.
Source: ForbesTech - 🏆 318. / 59 Read more »