IN RECENT years, the Supreme Court has made a habit of waving a gavel and turning blockbuster cases into duds. In the last year, two great reckonings—a pair of challenges to partisan gerrymandering and a tiff over a Colorado baker who refused to make a cake celebrating a gay wedding—were both defused with narrow rulings that steered around the heart of the disputes. The strategy of avoidance has its virtues: contentious questions continue to be asked, discussions advance.
with an artful dodge. Rather than address the fundamental conflict—anti-discrimination protections for gay people rubbing up against business owners’ First Amendment claims to run their shops in line with their conscience—seven justices found an escape route. The trouble with Colorado’s Civil Rights Commission wasn’t its decision to enforce the state’s public-accommodations law against the Christian baker who had turned away two men.
In 2013, Rachel Cryer and her mother walked into Sweetcakes By Melissa, a bakery in Gresham, Oregon. They wanted to order a custom wedding cake for Rachel and her fiancée, Laurel Bowman. But when Aaron Klein, the proprietor, heard the cake was for two women, according to the bakery’s, he “apologised and said that, because of their religious beliefs, he and his wife could not create a custom-designed cake for that purpose”.
The couple then complained to Oregon’s Bureau of Labour and Industries, which found that the Kleins had violated the state law requiring “full and equal accommodations, advantages, facilities and privileges of any place of public accommodation, without any distinction, discrimination or restriction on account of sexual orientation”. The fine was hefty—$135,000—and Sweetcakes soon went out of business.are familiar.
Would you mandate that a wood carver has to carve any and all cutomer requests? I believe liberal purity has confused serious discrimination with personal choice. This is not like racial discrimination. Blacks wanted to be served from the menu. They weren't demanding chitlins.
This issue should be resolved through civil discourse. Cake seller says 'We'd rather not make a gay-themed cake but you can buy any of our other cakes.' Buyer says, 'OK we'll go elsewhere.' Sellers must serve all customers but it's not mandatory to create special items for them.
This stuff has grown so stale!! It’s not a public store’s place to pass moral judgement on its customers. JUST SELL THEM THE CAKE or STOP BAKING FOR THE PUBLIC!!
In God We Trust ☂️😇☂️ Fallout101
My conscience won’t allow me to support republicans or evangelicals.
What the hell is is with bakers? Are there more haters in that business than among, say, carpenters?
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Supreme Court’s conservatives overturn precedent as liberals ask ‘which cases the court will overrule next’Justice Clarence Thomas said overruling a 40-year precedent is justified because it wrongly interpreted the Constitution. Take one guess MERRICK GARLAND StolenSeat Translation: Laws will now be judged against the actual Constitution and not legislated from the bench
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »
Supreme Court rules against Apple in App Store antitrust caseThe Supreme Court on Monday ruled 5-4 against Apple in a case involving its signature electronic marketplace, the App Store, allowing iPhone users to move forward with their suit against the company. Now do Facebook Absolutely
Source: CNBC - 🏆 12. / 72 Read more »
Supreme Court's Breyer, mentioning abortion case, warns about overturning precedentUS Supreme Court Justice Breyer warned Monday that his colleagues might be too eager to overturn earlier rulings that he said deserve respect as established precedent, mentioning a key abortion ruling as one of them. - PeteWilliamsNBC PeteWilliamsNBC All those women who are against abortion and claim to be Christians, should not be having sex unless they plan on pro creating even if they are married. Follow the Bible and God's word!! PeteWilliamsNBC Over turn them and others in the future PeteWilliamsNBC They only warn when its not on their side. Same old story different party. If is opinion was correct we would still have eugenics.
Source: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Read more »
The Supreme Court just ruled against Apple in an antitrust case centered around the App StoreThe U.S. Supreme Court on Monday gave the go-ahead for a lawsuit by consumers accusing Apple of monopolizing the market for iPhone apps. This is great news for the tech industry. SAI They are doing whatever they can to run the company. But then if everything is listed in the agreement for devs then this will not be a problem.
Source: BusinessInsider - 🏆 729. / 51 Read more »
Supreme Court deals Apple major setback in App Store antitrust caseThe Supreme Court is allowing iPhone users to move forward with their lawsuit against Apple. The suit argues Apple's 30% commission on sales through the App Store is an unfair use of monopoly power. China is one second away from booting Apple out of China. Time to short the mkt. You really think that exchange that you use is secured and safe. Aha sure :) Don’t think twice, keep your Assets secured, Get the Best Ledger Nano X at discounted price, Directly from Ledger. Unfair! It’s great, convenient and inexpensive. Show me a reason why I need multiple apps stores?
Source: CNBC - 🏆 12. / 72 Read more »
With abortion cases looming, Breyer warns Supreme Court may overturn major precedentNBC’s Pete Williams joins MTP Daily to discuss Supreme Court Justice Breyer appearing to issue a warning to his colleagues about Roe v. Wade, as several states move to enact abortion restricting legislation. Be careful what you wish for! I have a plan that would ELIMINATE abortions once and for all. Sterilize ALL boys at age 13! If desperate young women and girls must submit to forced medical procedures men must also! (We can reverse them if they get married.) Roe v. Wade is not being overturned. Even if it does, other states would make it legal. It was legal in some states before the decision. If precedent was wrong, it should be overturned. Abortion is a violence against the weakest. Parents who don't want to raise their child should give birth to an unborn child and entrust it to the care of government or social helper organization.
Source: MSNBC - 🏆 469. / 51 Read more »
After Alabama: Abortion cases up for Supreme Court reviewAlabama state Sen. Vivian Davis Figures asked a GOP senator why he wouldn't want Alabama's new abortion bill to include exceptions for victims of rape or incest 👇 a bunch of liberals screaming about how much they want to keep murdering babies. Religion should not be the law! Religion should not be forced on any person. Woman have the right to their own bodies! Spread of pro life legislation shows public sentiment is pro life. That’s how this works right? Or only when used to defend liberal positions? 🤔
Source: politico - 🏆 381. / 59 Read more »
Appeals court hears case in Idaho inmate's suit for gender confirmation surgeryAttorneys for Idaho prison officials argued that a transgender inmate who is suing for access to gender confirmation surgery is too mentally unstable to receive the irreversible medical procedure. Nasty This country needs a complete overhaul in regards to every aspect of authority
Source: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Read more »
Supreme Court says 1 state can't be sued in another's courtsWASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court is ruling that one state cannot unwillingly be sued in the courts of another, overruling a 40-year precedent.
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »