Supreme Court won't hear challenge to Trump's steel tariffs

  • 📰 cnnbrk
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 23 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 13%
  • Publisher: 55%

United States Headlines News

United States Latest News,United States Headlines

The US Supreme Court declines to hear a challenge to President Trump's 25% tariffs on foreign steel

Washington The US Supreme Court declined Monday to hear a challenge to President Donald Trump's 25% tariffs on foreign steel.

The case was brought by the American Institute for International Steel, which argued that the legal tool used by the President to impose the tariffs, known as Section 232, is unconstitutional. It's the second time the court refused to hear the case. Congress has jurisdiction over trade, but it has delegated some of its power to the executive branch. Section 232 allows the President to impose tariffs in order to protect national security.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

Tariffs are economy crushing taxes. Every economist knows this. Trump has proven it. Fed study: Trump tariffs backfired, caused job losses and higher prices

People we all need to watch this. Put partisan aside. Let’s unite against this. Please share

Without international trading you can forget the good economy Trump hijacked and destroyed.

Good.

In March 2019, the US Court of International Trade rejected the group's appeal , prompting it to file an appeal with the Federal Circuit .

He doesn’t understand how trade works. Import duties are a tax on American companies...not the exporters! Certain steel has to come from other countries. So other countries just order from elsewhere and that hurts US further....Trump is an uneducated idiot!

Open up those idle steel plants in the US

BREAKING: Joe Biden, Nancy Pelosi, and Kamala Harris will host an event in Chicago later this week to address the continued carnage in the city--including 10 dead, 67 shot on Father's Day weekend. Just kidding! They don't care about that.

Also notice CNN does not show market when rising. Lie of the century. CNN is the enemy of the people.

Time for another tariff nullification. Your move SCGOV

It is a presidential power. His trade wars are a tax on the American people but they are constitutional

National capitalist is the motto The American economy should work for Americans, not the 1%. Products for Americans should be manufactured in America. We do not live in simply market, we live in a country. Thank you for putting Americans first

🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂

That’s a massive roll of tape.

.realDonaldTrump has repeatedly sold America out for his own interests. It’s why we call him QuidProTrump.

Well there ya go ole , buddy awin lol

Today would be a good day for SCOTUS to make the orange man release those tax returns

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 393. in US

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

U.S. Supreme Court rejects challenge to Trump's steel tariffsThe U.S. Supreme Court on Monday turned away a challenge to President Donald Trump's tariffs on imported steel brought by an industry group that had argued that a key part of the law under which he imposed the duties violates the U.S. Constitution. American's are paying for the tariffs. Just thought you need to know it..
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »

Steel importers await Supreme Court decisionU.S. steel importers are anxiously waiting to find out whether the Supreme Court will agree to hear their case challenging the constitutionality of President Donald Trump’s steel tariffs I bet they wouldnt cry if trump put a 20% tax on domestic steel The Supreme Court decided not to hear a case brought by U.S. steel importers against tariffs Trump imposed on steel imports in 2018 Trump used Chinese steel in his buildings.
Source: politico - 🏆 381. / 59 Read more »

Supreme Court set to rule on landmark abortion case that could limit women's accessWhen Louisiana native Kim O'Brien decided to have an abortion in 2011 because her pregnancy had severe complications, she was unaware of the difficulties she would face -- including traveling to another state -- to get the care she is legally entitled to through Roe v. Wade. Now, nine years later
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »

Abortion case could end — or add to — streak of liberal wins at Supreme CourtThe left won Supreme Court cases on LGBT rights and DACA this week despite a conservative majority, but an upcoming abortion case has liberals holding their breath. What braintrust figured this out? Did John Madden write that headline? Eugene_Scott Oh word is it going to go one way or the other? Groundbreaking
Source: CNBC - 🏆 12. / 72 Read more »

What Happened After Nixon Failed to Appoint a Woman to the Supreme CourtHow Richard Nixon tried to soothe his wife after he failed to nominate a woman to the Supreme Court Tourism season is fast approaching. Book your weekend stay now. Border crossing times are low. Bring the family! visitChop Pat pat pat pat pat
Source: politico - 🏆 381. / 59 Read more »

DACA ‘unlawful’ despite Supreme Court ruling, acting Homeland Security chief saysActing Homeland Security Secretary Chad Wolf: The administration will follow the DACA ruling, but it's still looking 'to end an unlawful program' He realizes he’s only got 7 more months of employment, right? I came here for people who don’t know SCOTUS ruled on the executive order & not the legality of DACA. I was not disappointed.
Source: politico - 🏆 381. / 59 Read more »