Supreme Court won't hear case on transgender school bathroom policy

  • 📰 politico
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 9 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 7%
  • Publisher: 59%

United States Headlines News

United States Latest News,United States Headlines

The Supreme Court has declined to hear a case challenging a Pennsylvania school district’s bathroom policy allowing transgender students to use bathrooms of their choice

.Doe v. Boyertown Area School District

, alleging that the district’s policy violates student privacy. ADF has represented students and school districts in similar lawsuits across the country.

Source: Education Headlines (educationheadlines.net)

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

We need to know which justices opposed this

Violent right wing heads exploding!!!!

Sexual abuse and scandal is epidemic, the timing on this seems way out of touch.

Boy, Trump must be tired of all this winning!

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 381. in US

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

ABC News @ABCHAPPENING NOW: 2020 candidates expected to participate in abortion rights protest outside Supreme Court. Our bodies, our choice! Support PPFA today! I wonder if these citizens will be treated with the distain that a certain group of high school students were treated with earlier this year? Keep abortion legal!!
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »

Hundreds rally at U.S. Supreme Court, calling state abortion bans as step backwardAbortion-rights campaigners, including Democrats seeking their party's 2020... good, women have the right to chose! there trying to take all our freedom away!☝🏿👽😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘 and Full term abortions in NY are a forward step ? UNGA
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »

2020 Democrats join Supreme Court protest against state abortion bans'Vote them out!' Protestors demonstrated across the country against recently-passed restrictive abortion laws, rallying in front of the Georgia Capitol Building in Atlanta, lining the streets outside City Hall in Philadelphia, and more. 自由的美国 If women cared about literally anything else as much as they care about killing their children in utero, imagine what they could accomplish. They might have even closed the imaginary 'wage gap' by now. I think the progressive bots have failed to identify the reason for these laws. I can sum it up in two words......SCOTUS Showdown!
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »

William Barr claims the Trump administration isn't 'lawless' because the Supreme Court upheld the travel ban“Some say this proves that the Trump administration is lawless. Not surprisingly, I disagree,” Attorney General William Barr said while addressing the American Law Institute. 3 SCUMBAGS faint hope from Attorney General William Barr. Since he has recently joined the Administration it is not surprising that he does not have a twitter handle, Yet! Perhaps he believes this Administration (read POTUS) is perhaps too invested in Twitter, or Barr is not one to plan So says the mob boss’s lawyer.
Source: Newsweek - 🏆 468. / 52 Read more »

Fight over Trump’s financial records accelerates, could land at Supreme Court as 2020 race peaksHouse Democrats agreed to suspend deadlines for the president’s accounting firm to hand over his records, pending an expedited review by the federal appeals court in D.C. We’ll really teach that bastardized a lesson after he’s re-elected. I am wondering how is the Soviet Union hush money ratio in his balance sheet This is where you see his real success as President. Stacking the courts. It will save him. Too bad it does nothing for the rest of us. it's just never about the American people with this guy.
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »

Supreme Court temporarily blocks rulings requiring new voting maps for Ohio and MichiganJUST IN: US Supreme Court temporarily blocks rulings requiring new voting maps for Ohio and Michigan; lower court rulings had invalidated the maps as partisan gerrymanders. Democracy at work! 'take that you awful democrats that made me angry, take that!'
Source: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Read more »

Supreme Court blocks rulings requiring new U.S. House maps for Ohio, MichiganThe Supreme Court has blocked lower court rulings that invalidated, as partisan gerrymanders, Ohio’s map for congressional districts and Michigan’s maps for congressional and state legislative districts. NBC News' Pete Williams reports. This is what happens when toddlertrump and the GOP gets a hold of the USSC. They are already rigging the 2020elections. This SC is bad for America..the last vestige of a non-political branch of government is GONE..and WE let it happen. Pray for our democracy as we knew it! Supreme Court is controlled by partisans! Gorsuck and Kavanaugh were hand picked by DerangedDonald just like the Toad, Rumps personal lawyer!
Source: MSNBC - 🏆 469. / 51 Read more »

U.S. Supreme Court blocks redrawing of Ohio, Michigan electoral mapsThe justices granted requests from Republican lawmakers in both states to stay those decisions. The lower courts found that the electoral maps had been drawn to entrench the majority party in power, a practice known as partisan gerrymandering, in violation of the U.S. Constitution. While both disputes I’m laughing because some people think we need a third party. With gerrymandering and the support of the Supreme Court, we’re only going to have one party and become a Russian puppet! So, the dems want it drawn out in their favor? But they said they would lose clout. Lol.
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »

Supreme Court blocks gerrymandering rulings in Michigan and OhioThe Supreme Court set aside two lower court rulings tossing out congressional maps in Michigan and Ohio, putting the process of redrawing district lines on hold while it prepares to rule on whether partisan gerrymandering is constitutional YIKES! Michigan and Ohio are Seriously gerrymandered.
Source: politico - 🏆 381. / 59 Read more »

Supreme Court halts gerrymandering cases in Ohio and MichiganThe Supreme Court has agreed to put on hold partisan gerrymandering cases from Ohio and Michigan, temporarily sparing Republican lawmakers in those states of the need to redraw congressional districts by the summer. Because SCOTUS should be be asked to uphold constitutional access to fair voting. Oh wait. Gerrymandering is WRONG. Off course they have, I think the court and the president are setting up a dictatorship. Full implementation will be done with Ginsburg retires or dies.
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »

Supreme Court puts on hold gerrymandering rulings in Michigan, OhioThe Supreme Court agreed on Friday to put on hold lower court rulings that ordered new voting maps in Michigan and Ohio. Of Course the GOP wats gerrymandering so why not stop the lower courts from doing their constitutional duties? There are 5 GOP traitors to Democracy on board now. If gerrymandering is legal you do not have a functional democracy
Source: CNN - 🏆 4. / 95 Read more »