Supreme Court's Kagan continues case transparency ahead of Democrats' ethics push

Kagan, a liberal, recused herself from weighing in on a petition centering on a man who was convicted on one count of conspiring to commit money laundering, citing"prior government employment" at the Justice Department and her input in a brief against the petitioner's plea to a federal appeals court.

Monday marked the second time Kagan made a uniquely transparent decision to invoke her previous work as solicitor general as the reason for a conflict of interest that barred her from weighing in on a high court decision. Roberts turned down Senate Democrats who were adamant about having him testify after a series of ProPublica reports revealed Justice Clarence Thomas had not disclosed a series of past trips paid for by Harlan Crow, a benefactor who is a well-known Republican donor. The outlet also revealed undisclosed real estate transactions between the pair, and that Crow paid tuition for one of Thomas's relatives.

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Republicans set to lose multiple seats due to Supreme Court rulingNAACP president Derrick Johnson welcomed the Supreme Court's decision as a 'triumph for our democracy.'
Source: Newsweek - 🏆 468. / 52 Read more »

Why the Supreme Court Declined an Opportunity to Diminish the Voting Rights ActIn a new Q. & A., IChotiner speaks with ruthgreenwood about the Supreme Court’s recent ruling on Allen v. Milligan, which determined that Alabama’s redistricting had illegally diluted the power of Black voters.
Source: NewYorker - 🏆 90. / 67 Read more »

Supreme Court endorses race-based districtingChief Justice John Roberts famously wrote in a 2006 political redistricting case that “it is a sordid business, this divvying us up by race.” In a landmark redistricting decision on June 8, Roberts engaged in exactly this sordid business.
Source: dcexaminer - 🏆 6. / 94 Read more »

US Supreme Court Kicks American Wetlands When They're DownIt appears the Court's right-wing majority wants to open the floodgates to polluters even as we continue to learn more about just how connected wetlands are to bigger bodies of water and also to our entire way of life​.
Source: commondreams - 🏆 530. / 51 Read more »

Supreme Court Voting Rights Decision an Important, If Qualified, WinWhile Allen v. Milligan should be celebrated as a victory for fair representation, it cannot be an excuse for congressional inaction.
Source: commondreams - 🏆 530. / 51 Read more »

The Supreme Court’s voting rights decision was a missed opportunityThe Supreme Court handed down its decision in Allen v. Milligan on Thursday. Chief Justice John Roberts’s opinion found that Alabama’s latest congressional redistricting plan likely violated Section 2 of the 1965 Voting Rights Act. It did so because the map created only one majority black district…
Source: dcexaminer - 🏆 6. / 94 Read more »