Michael Li serves as counsel for the Brennan Center's Democracy Program, where his work focuses on redistricting, voting rights, and elections.written by Chief Justice John Roberts holding that state lawmakers violated the Voting Rights Act when they redrew Alabama’s congressional map after the 2020 census.
But if the decision didn’t further dismantle voting rights protections, it also didn’t strengthen them. In many ways, in fact, the win inUnder Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, minority voters can sue to force states or localities to change voting maps if they can show that racially polarized voting interacts with the design of maps to make it impossible for minority communities to win political power. That’s exactly what Black voters argued happened in Alabama.
with Black voters, ordering Alabama to redraw its map to create two districts “where Black voters either comprise a voting-age majority or something quite close to it.” Chief Justice Roberts, joined by Justice Brett Kavanaugh and the court’s three liberal justices, forcefullywhat they described as “Alabama’s attempt to remake our §2 jurisprudence anew.” Under Alabama’s approach, the court said “a State could immunize from challenge a new racially discriminatory redistricting plan simply by claiming that it resembled an old racially discriminatory plan.”
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Supreme Court voting rights ruling stuns minority voters, who hope it expands their representationThis week's Supreme Court decision ordering Alabama to redraw its congressional districts was seen by many minority lawmakers and voting rights activists as a stunning victory with the potential to become a major stepping stone for undoing political maps that dilute the strength of communities of color. Hank Sanders, a former Alabama state lawmaker who has long been politically active in the state, knew there would be a decision since the court heard arguments in the case last fall. “I was afraid they were going to go ahead and wipe out section 2,' he said, referring to the part of the Voting Rights Act at stake in the Alabama case.
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »
Opinion | The Supreme Court’s Voting Rights Act ruling is no victory for democracyOpinion by By Melissa Murray and Steve Vladeck: The court's decision in the Alabama redistricting case must be considered in the broader context.
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »
The Supreme Court’s Surprise Defense of the Voting Rights ActThe Supreme Court’s defense of the Voting Rights Act offers a slim hope that Justice John Roberts, and perhaps Justice Brett Kavanaugh, will not go to extremes in an upcoming redistricting case, which has the potential to destabilize the electoral system.
Source: NewYorker - 🏆 90. / 67 Read more »
A Rare Win for Voting Rights at the Supreme Court - Ms. MagazineA ruling in an Alabama case upheld a key provision of the Voting Rights Act, but challenges remain for communities of color.
Source: MsMagazine - 🏆 378. / 59 Read more »
Voting Rights Act survives at US Supreme Court but more challenges loomThe U.S. Supreme Court has granted an unexpected reprieve to a landmark law barring racial discrimination in voting after rolling back its protections over the past decade, but more challenges to the Voting Rights Act seem certain based on actions by Republican legislators in numerous states. Conservative Justices John Roberts and Brett Kavanaugh joined the court's three liberals in a 5-4 ruling on Thursday that declared that a Republican-drawn electoral map in Alabama weakened the clout of Black voters in violation of the Voting Rights Act.
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »
Why the Supreme Court Declined an Opportunity to Diminish the Voting Rights ActIn a new Q. & A., IChotiner speaks with ruthgreenwood about the Supreme Court’s recent ruling on Allen v. Milligan, which determined that Alabama’s redistricting had illegally diluted the power of Black voters.
Source: NewYorker - 🏆 90. / 67 Read more »