Supreme Court rules Apple will face antitrust suit for its iPhone apps

  • 📰 latimes
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 28 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 14%
  • Publisher: 82%

United States Headlines News

United States Latest News,United States Headlines

The Supreme Court has cleared the way for Apple to be sued under antitrust laws for allegedly monopolizing the sale of apps on its iPhones. The 5-4 decision in the closely watched case could open the way for similar lawsuits against other online giants.

The Supreme Court cleared the way Monday for Apple to be sued under antitrust laws for allegedly monopolizing the sale of apps on its iPhones.

Kavanaugh stressed the ruling only cleared the way for the suit. It did not mean the plaintiffs would finally prevail, he said. Much of corporate America had joined in support of Apple and argued that such broad antitrust claims should be blocked at the starting gate.Apple maintained that it could not be sued over its App Store because it was an electronic marketplace for products and services of other companies. App developers set the prices for each app in the Apple store, but Apple receives a 30% commission, Kavanaugh noted.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

Amazing, this packed Court can still get it right once in awhile.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 11. in US

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Supreme Court rules against Apple in App Store antitrust caseThe Supreme Court on Monday ruled 5-4 against Apple in a case involving its signature electronic marketplace, the App Store, allowing iPhone users to move forward with their suit against the company. Now do Facebook Absolutely
Source: CNBC - 🏆 12. / 72 Read more »

Supreme Court Allows Antitrust Suit Against Apple to ProceedThe Supreme Court ruled Monday that consumers can proceed with an antitrust lawsuit challenging Apple Inc.’s exclusive control over the marketplace for iPhone apps, threatening the tech giant’s slice of billions of dollars in software sales. Hell yeah. Ooh! I WANT A PIECE OF THAT! So won’t reign in Facebook, but will challenge the right of Apple to protect the security of users? Android is full of privacy & security issues BECAUSE they won’t control who can put apps into the system
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »

The Supreme Court just ruled against Apple in an antitrust case centered around the App StoreThe U.S. Supreme Court on Monday gave the go-ahead for a lawsuit by consumers accusing Apple of monopolizing the market for iPhone apps. This is great news for the tech industry. SAI They are doing whatever they can to run the company. But then if everything is listed in the agreement for devs then this will not be a problem.
Source: BusinessInsider - 🏆 729. / 51 Read more »

Supreme Court rules against Apple, allowing lawsuit targeting App Store to proceedThe 5-4 decision could spell serious repercussions for one of Apple’s most lucrative lines of business, and open the door for similar legal action targeting other tech giants in Silicon Valley. Is Apple screwed? WhiteSupremacist Attack on Muslim Family in Chicago StopKillingMuslims StopIslamophobia stophating WhiteSupremacistTerrorism first step in ending this never ending game of “monopoly”
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »

Strict state anti-abortion laws aimed at Supreme Court, justices not eager to consider themRed-state governors and legislators are rushing to enact tough new anti-abortion laws in hopes that the Supreme Court is ready to rule favorably. That’s not a problem thanks to President Trump Sometimes medical advances cause precedents to become outdated and untenable. It is time for SCOTUS to review it's prior decision. ProLife This is how GARepublicans rammed this bill through a CORRUPT, GERRYMANDERED Republican Legislature. OUR FREEDOM DIES AND IT WAS MURDER by the GOP! Fight back against EVIL REPUBLICANS! ewarren BetoORourke PeteButtigieg GeorgiaDemocrat OccupyWallSt MoveOn YourAnonNews
Source: USATODAY - 🏆 100. / 63 Read more »

Retired Supreme Court Justice: Trump 'exercising powers that do not really belong to him'Retired Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens accused President Donald Trump of exceeding his presidential powers in an interview published Thursday, telling The Wall Street Journal that the President 'has to comply with subpoenas.' While many on the hill have complied with absolutely nothing ..... criminals running the show ! And he would know!
Source: CNN - 🏆 4. / 95 Read more »

Venezuela's Supreme Court head rebuffs Pence's threats of sanctionsVenezuela's Supreme Court head, Maikel Moreno, on Wednesday rebuffed the U.... Let's see how that works out for you... venezuela will not be a vietnam only in Venezuela chavista a convicted kidnapper and murderer becomes the head of the supreme court, the venezuelan justice system in a nutshell...
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »

Venezuelan court asks pro-gov't assembly to allow prosecution of opposition lawmakersVenezuela's Supreme Court said on Tuesday it had asked the country's C... The criminals after the righteous The bad gorilas chasing the good humans this is long over due. Get those terrorists supported by the US out of Venezuela
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »

Protests erupt in India after top judge cleared of sexual harassmentDozens of protesters gathered outside India's Supreme Court on Tuesday, a d... India in the grip of immoral people in power. There are no protests in India... A fake allegation was taken down... A known lobby tried to tarnish the Chief Justice of India as he didn't bow to their whims and fancies... Reuters your source of funds seems to be the same as the lobby's... What an effort!
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »

Perspective | ‘Executive privilege’ is a new concept built on a shaky legal foundationIt’s not mentioned in the Constitution, and the Supreme Court only recognized it in 1974. Executive privilege is an old concept built on a shaky legal foundation. Obama started it. Too late to be going over this premise. It's entrenched now, and both sides of the aisle like it that way. So the SCOTUS did recognize it. NEXT!
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »