Plaintiffs, who are suing on behalf of a class of app purchasers, allege consumers pay inflated prices because Apple requires that all phone software be sold and purchased through the company’s App Store.
Apps would be cheaper if software developers could sell them directly...
3rdstringW Not sure how to feel about this one yet. On one side its Apple's AppStore and OS if you want in play by their rules. Running a platorm isn't cheap. On the other not everyone can eat 30% and be viable.
👍👍
In the wake of $AAPL trying to convince the world its a services company, this can be troubling. This is something not to be taken lightly
Tax paying citizens should be able to sue the government for having a monopoly on taxes and charging 30+% & the sales tax
Yall know you can use a phone besides Apple right?
Their store, their rules. Government should stay the fuck out of it.
When do people stop with the lawsuits and when does the US Justice system stop enabling? I don't have to own an Apple device or buy the apps that the developers didn't have to create for my device. Apple has a service and either you pay to use it or don't use it.
One can only hope they (apple) win. Imagine the bugs we’d see in apps if others could publish at free will.
JoannaStern Yeah more porns, malwares and scammers. Bad idea!!
This is a two edge sword, on one hand I and countless other app developers have had to submit to their rules and opaque decisions, but it has kept malware and non-functioning apps mostly out of the store. Still a long way to go to legal decision...years.
So won’t reign in Facebook, but will challenge the right of Apple to protect the security of users? Android is full of privacy & security issues BECAUSE they won’t control who can put apps into the system
Ooh! I WANT A PIECE OF THAT!
Hell yeah.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Supreme Court rules against Apple in App Store antitrust caseThe Supreme Court on Monday ruled 5-4 against Apple in a case involving its signature electronic marketplace, the App Store, allowing iPhone users to move forward with their suit against the company. Now do Facebook Absolutely
Source: CNBC - 🏆 12. / 72 Read more »
Appeals court allows Trump to keep asylum seekers in Mexico, for nowThe Mexican government agreed to accept the asylum seekers for humanitarian reasons, but described the policy as a unilateral move by the U.S. Good job! Since none of them have a legitimate claim to asylum, that’s a good thing
Source: politico - 🏆 381. / 59 Read more »
Appeals court allows Trump's policy of returning some asylum seekers to Mexico to continue for nowA federal appeals court is allowing the Trump administration to continue returning some asylum seekers to Mexico for the duration of their immigration hearings, for now Another win for the President! Stay strong realDonaldTrump we are with you! More layoffs at the dishonest, deceitful, incompetent CNN! 100 more employees CUT from the failing cable channel. Once the NEWS for the world, now can't garner an audience the size of Oklahoma City! Not that anyone in Oklahoma would watch CNN!
Source: CNN - 🏆 4. / 95 Read more »
Federal Appeals Court Allows Trump Back-to-Mexico Asylum Policy to Remain in EffectA federal appeals court ruled the Trump administration can, for now, continue with its policy of returning Central American migrants to Mexico while their requests for asylum in the U.S. are adjudicated. More Winning.. Great news. Explains the “Breaking news” about old info on his taxes.
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »
Appeals court allows U.S. to keep sending asylum seekers to MexicoA U.S. appeals court ruled on Tuesday that the Trump administration may continue... tomhals Sinfandela Bye. tomhals Sinfandela Seems reasonable to me tomhals Sinfandela Good 9 th district court is the enemy of America
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »
Retired Supreme Court Justice: Trump 'exercising powers that do not really belong to him'Retired Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens accused President Donald Trump of exceeding his presidential powers in an interview published Thursday, telling The Wall Street Journal that the President 'has to comply with subpoenas.' While many on the hill have complied with absolutely nothing ..... criminals running the show ! And he would know!
Source: CNN - 🏆 4. / 95 Read more »
Venezuela's Supreme Court head rebuffs Pence's threats of sanctionsVenezuela's Supreme Court head, Maikel Moreno, on Wednesday rebuffed the U.... Let's see how that works out for you... venezuela will not be a vietnam only in Venezuela chavista a convicted kidnapper and murderer becomes the head of the supreme court, the venezuelan justice system in a nutshell...
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »
Strict state anti-abortion laws aimed at Supreme Court, justices not eager to consider themRed-state governors and legislators are rushing to enact tough new anti-abortion laws in hopes that the Supreme Court is ready to rule favorably. That’s not a problem thanks to President Trump Sometimes medical advances cause precedents to become outdated and untenable. It is time for SCOTUS to review it's prior decision. ProLife This is how GARepublicans rammed this bill through a CORRUPT, GERRYMANDERED Republican Legislature. OUR FREEDOM DIES AND IT WAS MURDER by the GOP! Fight back against EVIL REPUBLICANS! ewarren BetoORourke PeteButtigieg GeorgiaDemocrat OccupyWallSt MoveOn YourAnonNews
Source: USATODAY - 🏆 100. / 63 Read more »
Protests erupt in India after top judge cleared of sexual harassmentDozens of protesters gathered outside India's Supreme Court on Tuesday, a d... India in the grip of immoral people in power. There are no protests in India... A fake allegation was taken down... A known lobby tried to tarnish the Chief Justice of India as he didn't bow to their whims and fancies... Reuters your source of funds seems to be the same as the lobby's... What an effort!
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »
Perspective | ‘Executive privilege’ is a new concept built on a shaky legal foundationIt’s not mentioned in the Constitution, and the Supreme Court only recognized it in 1974. Executive privilege is an old concept built on a shaky legal foundation. Obama started it. Too late to be going over this premise. It's entrenched now, and both sides of the aisle like it that way. So the SCOTUS did recognize it. NEXT!
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »