Supreme Court rejects inmate's bid for sex reassignment surgery

  • 📰 NBCNews
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 13 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 8%
  • Publisher: 86%

United States Headlines News

United States Latest News,United States Headlines

US Supreme Court declines to hear an appeal by a convicted murderer who filed a civil rights lawsuit because prison officials denied her request to be considered for gender reassignment surgery.

WASHINGTON — The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday refused to hear an appeal by a convicted murderer who filed a civil rights lawsuit because Texas prison officials denied her request to be considered for gender reassignment surgery.

The justices let stand a lower court's decision to reject the claim by inmate Vanessa Lynn Gibson that denying the surgery request violated the U.S. Constitution's Eighth Amendment prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

Good

Her? lol at

Taxpayers should not have to pay for that! Good decision!!😁😁😁😁😁😁😁

Sick

Say so long to your 'exit portal only' murderer. Enjoy your pink sock.

My insurance doesn't cover cosmetic surgery

Bat shit crazy . Our courts shouldn't be playing god.

The government isn’t responsible to pay for your mental illness. Especially when you’re a murderer.

Good. When your in prison you should have zero rights......

Good! Worry about serving your time and reforming yourself, rather than fiddling with your organs

Sorry about having to keep your wanger, dude.

Want all your rights? Don't go to prison.

👍

Nice.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 10. in US

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Supreme Court lets Kentucky abortion ultrasound law standA contested Kentucky law requiring a physician to display and describe a fetal ultrasound to patients seeking abortions has survived an appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court. Without explanation or notable dissent, the justices declined to take up the case brought by a Kentucky abortion provider, EMW Women
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »

U.S. Supreme Court rejects Arizona opioid case against Purdue, Sackler familyThe U.S. Supreme Court on Monday turned away a novel case by Arizona seeking to ... Poor people deserve to die Painfree. I know it’s not what people want to hear, but, if you’re going to kill a person for being poor, you should probably allow them to die painlessly. Best SCOTUS money can buy. of course they did. bet I can count the pros/cons
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »

Supreme Court rejects challenge to Kentucky abortion ultrasound lawThe Supreme Court rejects a challenge to a Kentucky law requiring doctors to describe and share audio from ultrasound to abortion seekers For some, the less they know the better. Being informed gives you power to make decisions and provides options. This has nothing to do with the sanctity of life & everything to do w/judgement & power. At the same time Rs r fighting against abortion, they r taking school lunches from kids & throwing ppl off SNAP. I'll say it again: this is abt judgement & power. It has nothing to do w/life. And how did Kavanaugh vote?
Source: cnnbrk - 🏆 393. / 55 Read more »

Supreme Court: Kentucky abortion ultrasound law to be left in placeAbortionIsMurder Outstanding news 😊. See the fetal images and hear the fetal heartbeat. Informed consent. This is good news.
Source: USATODAY - 🏆 100. / 63 Read more »

U.S. Supreme Court rejects challenge to Berkeley cell phone lawThe U.S. Supreme Court on Monday rejected a free speech challenge brought by a t...
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »

Supreme Court leaves in place Kentucky abortion law mandating ultrasoundsDoctors must perform ultrasounds and have women listen to fetal heartbeats before performing abortions. Well if you're going to be a murderer you might as well listen to what you're killing. Makes sense to me. This is bull$hit! 🤬 I'm an avidly Pro-life healthcare worker but this goes against a patient's rights.
Source: NBCNewsHealth - 🏆 707. / 51 Read more »