Supreme Court lets Kentucky abortion ultrasound law stand

  • 📰 ABC
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 34 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 17%
  • Publisher: 51%

United States Headlines News

United States Latest News,United States Headlines

Lower courts have been divided over 'display-and-describe' ultrasound laws. Two federal courts upheld the Kentucky law, but in a similar case out of North Carolina, a separate federal judge struck down the law.

Supporters of the measure say it's"prudent public policy" and important to ensuring patients give an informed consent to end a pregnancy. The law"does not require anyone to follow a set script; rather, the physician or qualified technician who is making the required disclosures can use his or her own words," the state of Kentucky wrote in court briefs.

Lower courts have been divided over"display-and-describe" ultrasound laws. Two federal courts upheld the Kentucky law, but in a similar case out of North Carolina, a separate federal judge struck down the law. "The Supreme Court has rubber-stamped extreme political interference in the doctor-patient relationship," said attorney Alexa Kolbi-Molinas with the ACLU, which helped bring the challenge to Kentucky's law."This law is not only unconstitutional, but as leading medical experts and ethicists explained, deeply unethical."Escort volunteers line up outside the EMW Women's Surgical Center in Louisville, Ky., July 17, 2017.

Source: Law Daily Report (lawdailyreport.net)

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 471. in US

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Supreme Court lets Kentucky abortion ultrasound law standA contested Kentucky law requiring a physician to display and describe a fetal ultrasound to patients seeking abortions has survived an appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court. Without explanation or notable dissent, the justices declined to take up the case brought by a Kentucky abortion provider, EMW Women
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »

Supreme Court rejects challenge to Kentucky abortion ultrasound lawThe Supreme Court rejects a challenge to a Kentucky law requiring doctors to describe and share audio from ultrasound to abortion seekers For some, the less they know the better. Being informed gives you power to make decisions and provides options. This has nothing to do with the sanctity of life & everything to do w/judgement & power. At the same time Rs r fighting against abortion, they r taking school lunches from kids & throwing ppl off SNAP. I'll say it again: this is abt judgement & power. It has nothing to do w/life. And how did Kavanaugh vote?
Source: cnnbrk - 🏆 393. / 55 Read more »

Supreme Court: Kentucky abortion ultrasound law to be left in placeAbortionIsMurder Outstanding news 😊. See the fetal images and hear the fetal heartbeat. Informed consent. This is good news.
Source: USATODAY - 🏆 100. / 63 Read more »

Supreme Court leaves in place Kentucky abortion law mandating ultrasoundsDoctors must perform ultrasounds and have women listen to fetal heartbeats before performing abortions. Well if you're going to be a murderer you might as well listen to what you're killing. Makes sense to me. This is bull$hit! 🤬 I'm an avidly Pro-life healthcare worker but this goes against a patient's rights.
Source: NBCNewsHealth - 🏆 707. / 51 Read more »

Supreme Court Lets Stand Kentucky Abortion Ultrasound LawThe Supreme Court on Monday let stand a Kentucky law requiring doctors to perform and describe an ultrasound examination—even over a patient’s objection—before performing an abortion. You live in the middle ages. When will your nation grow up? this law is an invasion of privacy. shameful ruling.
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »

U.S. Supreme Court rejects Arizona opioid case against Purdue, Sackler familyThe U.S. Supreme Court on Monday turned away a novel case by Arizona seeking to ... Poor people deserve to die Painfree. I know it’s not what people want to hear, but, if you’re going to kill a person for being poor, you should probably allow them to die painlessly. Best SCOTUS money can buy. of course they did. bet I can count the pros/cons
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »