The Supreme Court’s conservative majority sounded Monday ready to rule that a Christian website designer has a free-speech right to refuse to work with same-sex couples planning to marry.
In the case before the court, Lorie Smith, a website designer, said she would not work with same-sex couples because her Christian faith opposes such marriages. Kavanaugh suggested that only a small number of businesses could qualify for such an exemption. He said tailors, jewelers or caterers are probably not covered because their work is not purely expressive.
Twenty-two states including California require businesses open to the public to provide full and equal service to all, without regard to race, religion, gender or sexual orientation. Smith says she would like to expand her business designing websites to include weddings, but only if she can be assured she need not work with a same-sex couple. She sued seeking such a right and lost before a federal judge and the 10th Circuit Court in Denver.and decide whether it violates the free-speech clause of the 1st Amendment to “compel an artist to speak or stay silent.”
Lawyers for Colorado and the Justice Department disputed that claim. They said a refusal to work with same-sex couples planning a wedding is discrimination based on sexual orientation and does not involve speech.
Actually she works with all but does not feel comfortable writing some things on her cakes that are contrary to her faith.
What happened to SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE. your religious beliefs has nothing to do with consumerism or capitalism.
Not excusing bigotry in any way, but privately owned contract/commissioned businesses should be able to do business with whomever they choose. They’ll have repercussions for their choices. I certainly have no interest in taking the business from hate symbol wearing racists.
So if someone were to make up a religion that says they don’t approve of white people and won’t serve them then it would be perfectly fine with this SC because of the 1st Amendment, right? Oh that would be discrimination to do that?
Okay. Businesses should also have the right to refuse service to MAGA, ExtremistChristians, Republicans, homophobes, gun carriers, and AmericanNazis.
Always crazy Christian nationalists. Always. Ban religion. Ban the cults now.
SCOTUS creating a safe space for haters
Too bad it’s a question nobody except the bigot lady was asking. Nobody filed a complaint against her. She faces no enforcement action from the state. This is entirely a case of the right wing jerking each other off for kicks.
America lives to fight another day.
Yeah, but I’ll bet Susan Collins isn’t “deeply troubled”.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Ohio Supreme Court justices squabble over where to hang Maureen O'Connor portraitWhile judicial center staff, the court's three Democrats and O'Connor herself want the portrait displayed in the Grand Concourse, the court's three other Republican justices disagree. Only in Ohio where fair, LEGAL voting districts STILL have not been agreed upon, the most important issue is where to hang a portrait. LMAO
Source: DispatchAlerts - 🏆 72. / 68 Read more »
Supreme Court to decide if a Christian business owner can turn away gay weddingsJustices hear arguments Monday in the case of a Christian business owner claiming a free-speech right to turn away same-sex couples planning to marry. Christians such as these should hope that the winds of discrimination doesn’t blow on them. Christian shari law is coming She has rights too! DemocRATs want everyone to be Gay
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »
Cypress Christian falls to Dallas Christian in TAPPS Division III title gameCypress Christian’s quest for back-to-back TAPPS Division III championships came to an...
Source: HoustonChron - 🏆 609. / 51 Read more »
The Supreme Court must uphold the right to free speechThe Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on Monday for 303 Creative LLC v. Elenis and consider whether the state of Colorado can compel a web designer to create messages that violate her religious beliefs. The case is an opportunity for the court to expand its decision in Masterpiece Cakeshop v.… It will.. thats their purpose Fair just honest and well intentioned speech should be free The court will side with her, but she will be hit with one frivolous lawsuit after another by the state, until she runs out of money and is forced to close. The cake baker is still getting hit with lawsuits in his state, even after the courts agreed with him.
Source: dcexaminer - 🏆 6. / 94 Read more »
Supreme Court weighs 'most important case' on democracyThe Supreme Court is about to confront a new elections case, a Republican-led challenge asking the justices for a novel ruling that could significantly increase the power of state lawmakers over elections for Congress and the presidency. The court is set to hear arguments Wednesday in a case from North Carolina, where Republican efforts to draw congressional districts heavily in their favor were blocked by a Democratic majority on the state Supreme Court because the GOP map violated the state constitution. A court-drawn map produced seven seats for each party in last month's midterm elections in highly competitive North Carolina. Increase States powers? Constitutionally, the States already have the power to regulate their own election protocols. Federal government should stay out of State rights matters. Their multi-billionaire Unitary Executive GOP advocates & owners & donors want a favorable anti-democracy Ruling here 'So bad They can taste it Don’t state legislatures already have all the power? Isn’t that what’s written in our constitution?
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »
Supreme Court weighs ‘most important case’ on democracyThe Supreme Court is about to confront a new elections case that could dramatically alter voting in 2024 and beyond. A Republican-led challenge is asking the justices for a novel ruling that could …
Source: mercnews - 🏆 88. / 68 Read more »