Supreme Court hears arguments in a case that could reform the internet

  • 📰 YahooNews
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 32 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 16%
  • Publisher: 59%

United States Headlines News

United States Latest News,United States Headlines

Google presented arguments before the Supreme Court in a case that could reform the internet — and one of the justices admitted they didn't have the most tech expertise. 'These are not the nine greatest experts on the internet,' Justice Elena Kagan said.

), TikTok, and Twitter, can steer clear of legal responsibility when they recommend third party content.During arguments on Tuesday, justices questioned the plaintiffs’ contention that site owners, under, can be held liable when their organizational algorithms recommend particular content by generating thumbnails for suggested videos—and Google's claim that the company's mere organizational choices can't strip it of Section 230 protection.

"The question is what you do with the algorithm," Gonzalez's lawyer Eric Schnapper told the court. "It's the recommendation practice that we think is actionable." Associate Justice Elena Kagan asked if Section 230 should protect websites like YouTube, regardless of whether their search algorithms are neutral, a distinction made important by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals inwhich held that Section 230 provided liability protection because the defendant's algorithm recommended harmful third-party content in the same way that generated other recommended third-party content.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 380. in US

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Google Case Heads to Supreme Court With Powerful Internet Shield Law at StakeGoogle goes before the Supreme Court this week to defend what’s seen as a pillar of the online economy—one that is also blamed for a proliferation of harmful content If you haven't heard much from Iran these days, it's because the internet connection has reached an all time low followed by the government disruption on mobile data access. We are still fighting, we won't be silenced. IranRevolution Is this accurate news or is it false ? Nothing will happen.
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »

Google faces Supreme Court in case that could decide future of Section 230Open arguments before the nine justices are scheduled to begin on Tuesday. looks like the right-wing will finally get their FedSoc (federalist society) supreme court to destroy the internet, because of their fictious aggrieved feelings May that young woman and her family have Justice. Section 230 needs to be repealed. May that young woman and her family get the Justice they deserve. Get rid of Section 230. There is no reason for seditious ISIS material to reach our shores and be accessible under ANY circumstances.
Source: nypost - 🏆 91. / 67 Read more »

Supreme Court to hear arguments on Google and Twitter’s liability for terrorists’ online postingsThe Supreme Court will hear arguments this week in a pair of cases about the legal liability of tech platforms like Google and Twitter for content posted by terrorists.
Source: FoxBusiness - 🏆 458. / 53 Read more »

Supreme Court to hear oral arguments in Google case with potential to upend the internetAccording to the plaintiffs in the case — the family of Nohemi Gonzalez, who was killed in a 2015 ISIS attack in Paris — YouTube’s targeted recommendations violated a US antiterrorism law by …
Source: mercnews - 🏆 88. / 68 Read more »

Supreme Court weighs Google’s liability in ISIS terror caseThe justices are hearing arguments Tuesday about whether the family of a terrorism victim can sue Google for helping extremists spread their message and attract new recruits.
Source: cleveland19news - 🏆 70. / 68 Read more »

Supreme Court showdown for Google, Twitter and the social media worldAt the center of two cases to be argued over two days is Section 230, which provides tech companies a legal shield over what users post online. Not just social media, it protects any and every website that has user content. From facebook to a mom and pop site about knitting, if you allow users to comment/post, 230 protects you from being sued because of said posts. Is it crazy to expect an outcome that curtails Musk’s libertarian nonsense? Tell me you know that Hunter Biden is in business with the nephew of Whitey Bulger, James Bulger. BHR
Source: NPR - 🏆 96. / 63 Read more »