The U.S. Supreme Court hears arguments this week in two cases that test Section 230, the law that provides tech companies a legal shield over what their users post online.Celal Gunes/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images
Representing the terrorism victims against Google and Twitter, lawyer Eric Schnapper will tell the Supreme Court this week that when Section 230 was enacted, social media companies wanted people to subscribe to their services, but today the economic model is different. "The attorney general, the director of the FBI, the director of national intelligence, and the then-White House chief of staff . . . those government officials . . . told them exactly that," he says."We believe that there's no place for extremist content on any of our products or platforms," she says, noting that Google has"heavily invested in human review" and"smart detection technology," to "make sure that happens.
Even if I don't like what you say,I shouldn't tell you not to say it. Twitter and Google can't become the 'speech police'. But don't yell fire in a crowded theater that's not free speech,it's harmful...capache?
Our children are being fed content by AI and algorithms that is extremely harmful. This includes but not limited to pedos, sex traffickers, bullies, drug dealers and thinspiration content. We should all hope the justices educate themselves on this law.
Tell me you know that Hunter Biden is in business with the nephew of Whitey Bulger, James Bulger. BHR
Is it crazy to expect an outcome that curtails Musk’s libertarian nonsense?
Not just social media, it protects any and every website that has user content. From facebook to a mom and pop site about knitting, if you allow users to comment/post, 230 protects you from being sued because of said posts.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Google faces Supreme Court in case that could decide future of Section 230Open arguments before the nine justices are scheduled to begin on Tuesday. looks like the right-wing will finally get their FedSoc (federalist society) supreme court to destroy the internet, because of their fictious aggrieved feelings May that young woman and her family have Justice. Section 230 needs to be repealed. May that young woman and her family get the Justice they deserve. Get rid of Section 230. There is no reason for seditious ISIS material to reach our shores and be accessible under ANY circumstances.
Source: nypost - 🏆 91. / 67 Read more »
Supreme Court for first time casts doubt on Section 230, the legal shield for Big TechThe legal shield known as Section 230 launched Big Tech and was largely unchallenged in the Supreme Court — until now. Any attempt to overturn 230 is a violation of the first amendment. Finding for the plaintiff puts all kinds of people at risk. Terrorist rents truck, blows up something: are the builders of the roads he used liable how about the truck manufacturer, or the rental agency?
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »
Listen Live: Supreme Court\u0027s Section 230 case could reshape the 'fundamental architecture' of the internetYouTube's recommendations algorithm, and those used by platforms like TikTok, Facebook and Twitter, are at the heart of a legal dispute that's going to the Supreme Court. I work at Facebook doing content moderation algorithm coding. I’m sure the Supreme Court will affirm our right to protect the users from conservative hate speech!
Source: CBSNews - 🏆 87. / 68 Read more »
What is Section 230, the rule that made the modern internet?A case coming before the U.S. Supreme Court this week, Gonzalez v. Google, challenges this law — namely whether tech companies are liable for the material posted on their platforms.
Source: wsfa12news - 🏆 338. / 59 Read more »
I Changed My Mind About Section 230The man who wrote the book on the '26 words that created the internet' walks us through what we need to know about the online debate to end all online debates. This isn't going to age well.
Source: Gizmodo - 🏆 556. / 51 Read more »
What is Section 230, the rule that made the modern internet?A case coming before the U.S. Supreme Court this week, Gonzalez v. Google, challenges this law — namely whether tech companies are liable for the material posted on their platforms.
Source: cleveland19news - 🏆 70. / 68 Read more »