The question for the court has to do with whether the toy's maker infringed on Jack Daniel's trademarks.
Listen now and subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Google Podcasts | Spotify | RSS Feed | Omny Studio Jack Daniel's, based in Lynchburg, Tennessee, isn't amused. At the heart of the case is the Lanham Act, the country's major trademark law. It prohibits using a trademark in a way"likely to cause confusion ... as to the origin, sponsorship, or approval of ... goods." Jack Daniel's says that's what the dog toy does. It says a lower court was wrong to side with VIP.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Supreme Court to hear case between Jack Daniel's and dog toy makerIt's a brand battle in the Supreme Court this week as whiskey maker Jack Daniel's Properties, Inc. takes on a dog toy manufacturer in a case over free speech and federal trademark law. I’m no lawyer but even after reading the article I hope the courts side with JackDaniels_US Using it in a mocking way or not it’s their original brand. This is an interesting case! It will be interesting to see how the Supreme Court rules and what implications this has for free speech and trademark law. There are just mad they didn't come up with it, lolol. It's free advertising, leave it alone.....
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »
Jack Daniel's tells Supreme Court its brand is harmed by dog toy Bad SpanielsThe Supreme Court is hearing arguments in a case that pits whiskey giant Jack Daniels against a dog toy maker whose best-selling chewy toy parodies the brand. So what it will do if they win is allow a big corporation to steal a trademark it never bothered to get like big corps do to small businesses but .. they may be able to force the company to give up that trademark even though.. they didnt register it? Judicial Abuse for big corp Interesting approach all things considered… You know because everyone confuses (and compares at the same time) chew toys for dogs with whiskey. 🤦♀️
Source: NPR - 🏆 96. / 63 Read more »
Supreme Court takes up Jack Daniel's bid to toss chew toy parodyOral arguments begin today as JackDaniels_US urges SCOTUS to toss out a lower court ruling that would allow a dog toy company to continue manufacturing 'Bad Spaniels' line of chew toys, a parody of the company's famous whiskey bottle. JackDaniels_US Won't buy another brownforman product ever again. JackDaniels_US I'm no expert but I think they're going to get jacked.
Source: dcexaminer - 🏆 6. / 94 Read more »
Supreme Court chews on Jack Daniel's dog toy disputeWASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court is hearing a spirited dispute Wednesday between whiskey maker Jack Daniel’s and the manufacturer of a squeaking dog toy that parodies the liquor's bottle and label. Spirited dispute. Funny. yeah , cuz doggy alcoholism is a thing . JackDaniels_US where’s your sense of humor?🙃
Source: AP - 🏆 728. / 51 Read more »
Jack Daniel's vs. a dog toy: Why the Supreme Court is involvedThe Supreme Court is hearing a spirited dispute Wednesday between whiskey maker Jack Daniel’s and the manufacturer of a squeaking dog toy that parodies the liquor's bottle and label. Yes Do who if it did.
Source: wsyx6 - 🏆 444. / 53 Read more »
Supreme Court chews on Jack Daniel's dog toy disputeA dispute between Jack Daniel’s and the makers of a squeaking dog toy that humorously mimics the whiskey’s signature look gave Supreme Court justices a lot to chew on. Who cares. Meanwhile China duplicates everything.
Source: wjxt4 - 🏆 246. / 63 Read more »