Supreme Court chews on Jack Daniel's dog toy dispute

  • 📰 AP
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 25 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 13%
  • Publisher: 51%

United States Headlines News

United States Latest News,United States Headlines

The Supreme Court is hearing a spirited dispute between whiskey maker Jack Daniel's and the manufacturer of a squeaking dog toy that parodies the liquor's bottle and label.

FILE - A bottle of Jack Daniel's Tennessee Whiskey is displayed next to a Bad Spaniels dog toy in Arlington, Va., Nov. 20, 2022. The Supreme Court is hearing a dispute, Wednesday, March 22, 2023 between Jack Daniel’s and the manufacturer of the squeaking dog toy that parodies the liquor’s bottle and label. The question for the court has to do with whether the toy makers infringed on Jack Daniel’s trademarks. Arizona-based VIP Products produces the Bad Spaniels toy.

FILE - A bottle of Jack Daniel's Tennessee Whiskey is displayed next to a Bad Spaniels dog toy in Arlington, Va., Nov. 20, 2022. The Supreme Court is hearing a dispute, Wednesday, March 22, 2023 between Jack Daniel’s and the manufacturer of the squeaking dog toy that parodies the liquor’s bottle and label. The question for the court has to do with whether the toy makers infringed on Jack Daniel’s trademarks. Arizona-based VIP Products produces the Bad Spaniels toy.

Source: Law Daily Report (lawdailyreport.net)

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

Too funny

C: The Supreme Court rules in favor of the squeaky dog toy affirming it does not infringe Jack Daniels whiskey alcohol trademark.

A captured court instituting fascism and we're talking about this?

Toys are a separate thing. It's far more complex than parody.

What a nasty, humourless company you are, Jack Daniel’s! They are not even competing in the same market. I hope right-thinking drinkers will look elsewhere.

WTF?

It’s “infringed trademarks” not “infringed on trademarks”

No. The question is whether they'll throw out hundreds of years of precedent of 'fair use' for parody in favor of 'screw the little guy, more money to rich companies.' Which, given this court, they might do.

AP continues to avoid the Biden scandals.

This is how they spend their time? This and undoing civil and equal rights? This is what our current Supreme Court thinks is a case they need to hear? That dog toy company is about to lose. That’s not helping the USA citizenry, but the big Corporation will win. WTF

I suppose that at the end they own both companies and just wanted some attention lol

They realized the profits on the back of Jack Daniels. It’s not a joke, it’s about money.

Barbie verses Aqua all over again.

It’s trademarked. Everything, the label, text, even the format of the text, shape of the bottles….

This is so stupid. JackDaniels_US

Hey JackDaniels_US you're kind of being jerks here

This is ridiculous. If anything, it’s free advertising for their product.

wouldn’t be surprised if scotus tried to take away protections for parody

C'mon. This is a CLEAR parody! 🤣🤣🤣

Jack Daniel’s is mediocre whiskey anyway and I guess it makes sense that a clown court wants to hear a clown lawsuit

Parody is protected. Should be obvious.

Is there any case law on cross-species likelihood of confusion?

I have a feeling that this court case is going to the dogs.

I hope the top court in the land gets this crucial case figured out. I’ve been tricked by the dog toy several times when I was just trying to get drunk.

Was pretty sure that parody was covered under the first amendment.

“While we love our customers, they’re often times drunk and if they see something that looks like our bottle but has the word poo on it, now they just might think they’ve been drinking poo for the last two decades…”

Looks like parody to me.

I totally thought that one on the right was a real bottle of Jack Daniels.

Dogs gotta get drunk too.

Excellent way to spend taxpayers money…

Restaurant owner in Queens, NY watching this case very carefully. Big Mick - his buns have no seeds, totally different.

Spirited hahah. Get it? Journalism is dead

I have the Barks root beer and Hienie-sniffin chew toy bottles.

JackDaniels_US where’s your sense of humor?🙃

This is very important? WTF?

Hey Jack, get a sense of humor.

Spirited dispute. Funny.

yeah , cuz doggy alcoholism is a thing .

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 728. in US

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Supreme Court to hear case between Jack Daniel's and dog toy makerIt's a brand battle in the Supreme Court this week as whiskey maker Jack Daniel's Properties, Inc. takes on a dog toy manufacturer in a case over free speech and federal trademark law. I’m no lawyer but even after reading the article I hope the courts side with JackDaniels_US Using it in a mocking way or not it’s their original brand. This is an interesting case! It will be interesting to see how the Supreme Court rules and what implications this has for free speech and trademark law. There are just mad they didn't come up with it, lolol. It's free advertising, leave it alone.....
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »

Jack Daniel's tells Supreme Court its brand is harmed by dog toy Bad SpanielsThe Supreme Court is hearing arguments in a case that pits whiskey giant Jack Daniels against a dog toy maker whose best-selling chewy toy parodies the brand. So what it will do if they win is allow a big corporation to steal a trademark it never bothered to get like big corps do to small businesses but .. they may be able to force the company to give up that trademark even though.. they didnt register it? Judicial Abuse for big corp Interesting approach all things considered… You know because everyone confuses (and compares at the same time) chew toys for dogs with whiskey. 🤦‍♀️
Source: NPR - 🏆 96. / 63 Read more »

Supreme Court takes up Jack Daniel's bid to toss chew toy parodyOral arguments begin today as JackDaniels_US urges SCOTUS to toss out a lower court ruling that would allow a dog toy company to continue manufacturing 'Bad Spaniels' line of chew toys, a parody of the company's famous whiskey bottle. JackDaniels_US Won't buy another brownforman product ever again. JackDaniels_US I'm no expert but I think they're going to get jacked.
Source: dcexaminer - 🏆 6. / 94 Read more »

Oscar Winners Daniel Kwan and Daniel Scheinert Directed an Episode of ‘Star Wars’ Series ‘Skeleton Crew’Daniel Kwan and Daniel Scheinert have leapt from the multiverse to a galaxy far, far away. The Oscar-winning directing duo have helmed an episode of the upcoming “Star Wars” series “Skeleton Crew” for Disney+. New news right here
Source: Variety - 🏆 108. / 63 Read more »

Dog day in court: Jack Daniels sues pet company over squeaky toyBoth companies are refusing to roll over in this dog toy lawsuit.
Source: WTVYNews4 - 🏆 590. / 51 Read more »

'Poop-themed dog toys' shaped like whiskey bottles face Supreme Court trademark showdownThe Supreme Court to debate whether Jack Daniel's has to grin and bear it over humorous dog 'poop-themed' toys that bear a resemblance to its iconic whiskey bottles. Who reads the fine print on a dog toy? Finally SCOTUS gets a case right up their alley.
Source: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Read more »