Supreme Court agrees to hear deadly DC sniper shootings case

  • 📰 politico
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 16 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 10%
  • Publisher: 59%

United States Headlines News

United States Latest News,United States Headlines

The Supreme Court agreed to consider Virginia’s plea to reinstate the life-without-parole sentence of a man who as a teenager participated in sniper shootings that terrorized the Washington, D.C., region in 2002

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to consider Virginia’s plea to reinstate the life-without-parole sentence of a man who as a teenager participated in sniper shootings that terrorized the Washington, D.C., region in 2002.

The Supreme Court will review that decision. As is typical, the justices did not make any comment in agreeing to hear the case, which likely will be heard in the fall. Virginia’s appeal was among four criminal cases the court added to its docket for the term that begins in October. In the others:

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

We lived in terror! Yet, he was still very much a child under this horrific adult pressure!

wouldn’t that be double jeopardy?

He was young. He was manipulated by the older man. The state is treating him unfairly.

He did not participate. He murdered people. Glossing over this is an embarrassment.

While this crime was particularly egregious, as a 'child' who was highly influenced by an adult and not fully formed, how responsible is he for his actions? The science is not clear on such cases.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 381. in US

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

2020 Candidates float plans to change Supreme CourtAre changes to the Supreme Court on the horizon? chucktodd looks at some of the ideas that 2020 presidential candidates have been considering. chucktodd Well....RBG is 86 today. She isn’t going to last forever chucktodd Let's not mess with our government structure. Let's just remove the corruption. DrainTheSwamp chucktodd Investigate Brett Kavanaugh!!!
Source: MSNBC - 🏆 469. / 51 Read more »

Supreme Court agrees to hear deadly DC sniper shootings caseWASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to consider Virginia's plea to reinstate the life-without-parole sentence of a man who as a teenager participated in sniper shootings that... NO One of the least reported Islamic terrorist attacks of all time.
Source: AP - 🏆 728. / 51 Read more »

Supreme Court to consider sentence for D.C.-area sniperSupreme Court to consider new sentence for Lee Boyd Malvo who was sentenced to life in prison for his role in a series of shootings that killed 10 people in the Washington, DC, area in 2002. Why waste time on him? If he is guilty, let him rot. Having lived in the DMV when this was going on, what a nightmare this was! People weren’t going outside....
Source: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Read more »

Supreme Court agrees to hear deadly DC sniper shootings caseDeath Penalty They try to save some pennies, giving this monster room and board, for life? (60 yrs. of dentist, doctor and guards bills? He said, 'that kid scares the sh☆t out of us.'
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »

Supreme Court rejects Hawaii B&B that refused to serve lesbian coupleSupreme Court declines to hear challenge to lower court ruling that found that the owner of a Hawaii bed and breakfast violated a state anti-discrimination law by turning away a lesbian couple, citing Christian beliefs. Who cares? Religious beliefs always win in Supreme Court cases. It’s disgusting but true. The US is not a secular nation as they lead many to believe. GOOD
Source: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Read more »

Supreme Court will take up immigration-related case next termThe Supreme Court agreed on Monday to hear a case next term concerning Kansas' prosecution of three undocumented immigrants for using stolen Social Security numbers in an effort to gain employment. Is Ruth sleeping again? If American citizens can be prosecuted for using stolen Social Security numbers, it is ludicrous to think that illigal immigrants cannot be prosecuted for the same crime!! Is that a stuffed head of RBG? 🤔
Source: cnnbrk - 🏆 393. / 55 Read more »

Supreme Court to consider whether Beltway sniper Lee Boyd Malvo deserves new sentencingBetween Sept. 5 and Oct. 22, 2002, John Allen Muhammad and Malvo killed 10 people and wounded others in sniper attacks in Virginia, Maryland and the District of Columbia. Sure, give him the death sentence and save the taxpayers the expense of supporting him for another 20 or more years. We must allow ourselves to find root cause for mass killings by guns. And accept the fact for what it is. I ask myself, why is it 90% White Males and White Supremacist emboldened, American Citizens? no
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »

2020 Dems warm to expanding Supreme CourtA series of White House hopefuls are expressing new interest in remaking the courts — payback for Republican aggression during the Obama presidency. The solution for democrats every time they lose...change the rules. Laughable Very interesting topic for politicalscience
Source: politico - 🏆 381. / 59 Read more »

Supreme Court expands scope of census citizenship question caseSupreme Court announced it's expanding the scope of the case against the Trump admin.'s decision to add a citizenship question to the 2020 census, agreeing to decide whether the move violated the Constitution. RickyRayinGA Only citizens may vote period! 🤣 🤣. Citizen questions on a cencus... How dare him... Talking about taking the pulse of a government 'body'! This is like an acid test!
Source: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Read more »

Analysis | The Democrats’ premature fantasies about packing the Supreme Court and nixing the filibusterThe ideas might have merit, but proposing them while you're out of power is a highly questionable strategy. Yes, they're premature. The whole gang has premature and immature bubbly ideas She Wasn't Supposed to Lose 🤣 So a couple of fringe candidates with no chance to win , entertain the ideas in your article, and suddenly they represent the WHOLE DEM party. Okay...I see its gonna' be 2016 again with you guys in the media this campaign. No clue at all.
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »