Opinion | We May Get a Conservative Chief Justice

  • 📰 WSJ
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 72 sec. here
  • 3 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 32%
  • Publisher: 63%

United States Headlines News

United States Latest News,United States Headlines

From WSJopinion: If Chief Justice Roberts joins the liberals in dissent, Justice Thomas gets to assign authorship of the conservative majority’s opinion, writes jamestaranto

” was the headline of an article I wrote in the Journal late in 2004. I urged President George W. Bush to elevate Justice Clarence Thomas if Chief Justice William Rehnquist retired the following year. Mr. Bush didn’t follow my advice when Rehnquist died in September 2005. But as Amy Coney Barrett dons her high-court robe, Justice Thomas may find himself filling an unaccustomed leadership role.

Over the past decade Chief Justice John Roberts emerged as a frequent swing vote when the associate justices divided 4-4 along familiar liberal-conservative lines. In numerous cases—most famously, which upheld ObamaCare—he cast his vote with the four Democratic appointees, although his opinions were sometimes less sweeping than theirs.

A charitable observer would say that Chief Justice Roberts is concerned about the court’s legitimacy and independence—that he wishes above all to avoid the perception that it responds to political pressure. An uncharitable one would say that in pursuit of that objective, he is creating not only the appearance but the reality of a political court. Either way, with a Republican-appointed majority of associate justices, the chief justice has lost this tie-breaking power.

That’s where Justice Thomas comes in. The chief justice is an especially potent swing voter, because he also has the power to assign authorship of the majority opinion, including to himself. That can help shape a decision’s scope and direction—usually, in Chief Justice Roberts’s case, by making it more tentative.

If the chief justice is in dissent, however, the assignment power falls to the most senior associate justice in the majority. Clarence Thomas is now the most senior justice, so he will assign authorship any time he is in the majority and Chief Justice Roberts dissents.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

opinion jamestaranto Justice Thomas has proved to be one of the worst judges the Supreme Court has ever had. Republicans jam unfit judges into the Supreme Court to force their ideology on the country. Anyone who understands the history of the court knows it is not in a good place

opinion jamestaranto What an ugly group - both inside and out... Two predators, an enabler and an idiot...

opinion jamestaranto JoeBiden had to be rushed away today when in mid sentence he went delusional. He doesn’t have the mental capacity to be President if he can’t keep his dementia under control.

opinion jamestaranto

opinion jamestaranto oh goodie, the guy who likes to leave pubic hairs on cans of coke.

opinion jamestaranto If you're okay with McConnell not allowing a vote on the seat vacated by Scalia but are okay with him ramming through a vote on the one vacated by Ginsburg, your opinion means nothing.

opinion jamestaranto WSJ, So the senate takes a life long law scholar that practices being a Judge FOR ONLY 3 YEARS and PLACES HER on the supreme court... Didn’t we already elect and inexperienced President with catastrophic results... “Oh ok, well that answers the question!”

opinion jamestaranto Well, McConnell showed Democrats the way: if they keep the House, win the Senate and Presidency, they should expand the Court from 9 to 13. It’s been done before - seven times. Exercise power, norms do not matter any more. These are the McConnell Rules

opinion jamestaranto It's not a matter of 'gets to assign', there is no 'gets' to it.

opinion jamestaranto WE WILL SAVE LIVES, WE MUST STOP THE KILLING OF BABIES, BY DEMOCRATS.

opinion jamestaranto From what we’ve seen, only Barrett and Gorsuch have logical thoughts processes.

opinion jamestaranto Don’t get your hopes up. If Roberts doesn’t want Thomas to have that authority, he’ll just vote with the majority. No substantive difference between a 6-3 or 5-4 decision.

opinion jamestaranto It’s within constitutional rights to pack the court... but Biden & team has to win Nov 3rd. Last mile!

opinion jamestaranto Justice Thomas was considering retiring, but now that he's poised to be the most powerful justice on the court he might stick around for a while.

opinion jamestaranto Roberts was a huge mistake. What a pansy

opinion jamestaranto Great stuff

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 98. in US

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Associate Justice Amy Coney Barrett sworn in and greeted with a recusal request in election caseJustice Amy Coney Barrett has recited the judicial oath in a swearing-in ceremony administered by Chief Justice John Roberts, officially beginning her tenure as the 115th justice on the Supreme Court And now the suffering of millions of Americans will begin. Fucking bullshit! Biggest phoney ever. Sneaky snake She does not fool anyone. People will be very angry if she screws them, just saying
Source: CNN - 🏆 4. / 95 Read more »

Mitch McConnell’s Court Tactics Pay Off in Amy Coney Barrett ConfirmationMitch McConnell has prioritized a conservative court for years. His success has sparked dismay among Democrats, who say his methods have deepened partisan divides and could set off further retaliation that would remake the way the Senate operates. Moscow senatemajldr Mitch McConnell should update his CV. You’re about to be fired, Mitchy if it doesnt set off retaliation, we're fucked and doomed to live under minority rule in perpetuity
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »

Senate to vote on Amy Coney Barrett's confirmation to Supreme Court following all-night Senate sessionThe Republican-led Senate is expected to confirm Barrett to the Supreme Court in a vote Monday evening, capping off a sprint to place her on the high court before Election Day over Democratic objections. Just another way the trump administration has pushed us backwards in time. It’s INSANE we are about to confirm somebody who thinks it’s appropriate to use the N word in the work place Ask yourself if this reminds you of anything... Elderly let'em die Diseased let'em die Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid users let'em die People of color let'em die The poor, underrepresented and disenfranchised LET'EM DIE They can't wait one week. They are scared of losing and I pray they do 🙏
Source: USATODAY - 🏆 100. / 63 Read more »

Senate Confirms Amy Coney Barrett To The Supreme CourtThe 48-year-old judge solidifies the court's conservative majority, filling Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's seat just about a week before Election Day. Lol. It would suck for my clients but if i were a lawyer at the court I’d refused to say “your honor” when addressing these three pieces of shit for judges. PackTheCourt Trump2020
Source: NPR - 🏆 96. / 63 Read more »

Senate Confirms Trump Nominee for Supreme Court, Amy Coney BarrettBarrett will give conservatives a 6-3 majority on the court by filling the vacancy left by the liberal icon Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg who died in September Oh FUCK !! Millions of Americans will lose health insurance if that puppet has her way If you love your country, vote him out. Shout it loud, and sing it proudly for democracy. Share, repost, retweet, etc.
Source: RollingStone - 🏆 483. / 51 Read more »

Amy Coney Barrett is set to transform America’s Supreme CourtAmy Coney Barret's confirmation recalls the rightward shift in 1991 when the archconservative Clarence Thomas succeeded a civil-rights icon, Thurgood Marshall This is what going back in time looks like! Enjoy it while you can, once the Dems win, we will stack the court. Don’t bitch about it, you were all warned before you decided to confirm ACB. is now a propaganda outlet for the Falun Gong cult. She seems to be a lightweight without much experience. Her originalism is a worry, where’s she stopping at women’s rights, shucks we could lose the vote.
Source: TheEconomist - 🏆 6. / 92 Read more »