The confirmation hearings for Amy Coney Barrett, which begin on Monday, have a near certain outcome. With 53 Republican senators, and all but two having said that they would vote on her nomination before the election, there is nothing the Democrats can do to block her from becoming a Supreme Court justice.
So, what tack should the senators who oppose her appointment take during the hearing? Their questions should focus on three areas, aiming to expose the danger Barrett’s far-right conservatism poses to treasured rights Americans have embraced as settled law. With that in mind, one line of questioning should be to push Barrett on whether she can identify anyone holding this originalist approach who ever has supported abortion rights or the right of same-sex couples to marry.
A second line of questioning should focus on how little weight she would give to previous rulings. As a law professor, Barrett wrote that precedent deserves little, if any weight, in constitutional law, noting that, “a justice’s duty is to the Constitution and that it is thus more legitimate for her to enforce her best understanding of the Constitution rather than a precedent she thinks clearly in conflict with it.
Source: Entertainment Trends (entertainmenttrends.net)
opinion Nothing's going to change. The people in charge of this world do what they want. Knowing about it won't change anything.
opinion Yawn. Temper tantrum-ing on a Monday morning?
opinion Kamikaze wasn’t a winning strategy in ‘45 & it hasn’t improved since. Attack at your own risk, genius.
opinion Even if they prove everything that we all know is true!!! What is going to change?
opinion There is no way this deeply religious woman is not going to let her beliefs affect her decisions. She will lie her way to the bench & Trump will have his insurance to protect him from post presidential legal trouble. All of us have beliefs we bring to the job but she is extreme.
opinion Do same sex marriage couples have children in any other way than by adoption? Is the murdering of fetus the best birth control for women or is it offered because human tissue and body parts is a lucrative business for abortionists? ProLife prochoice LBGT merchantsofdeath
opinion Yes, yes, who better than an attention-seeking lawyer to weigh in? 'Opinion Journalism from O.J. Simpson to Amy Coney Barrett: My Life of Service' by Erwin Chemerinsky
opinion Got your talking points this morning
opinion Ask about teaching science. Does anyone in the district whether working/attending/simply living in the area get the 'freedom' to impose their religion on everyone else if it's against evolution?
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »
Source: CNN - 🏆 4. / 95 Read more »
Supreme Court nominee Barrett pledges fealty to law as Senate hearing loomsU.S. Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett will tell senators in her high-stakes confirmation hearing this week that she will approach cases based on the law, not her personal views, as Democrats urged her to step aside on an upcoming challenge to the Obamacare law and... The president and his family are being investigated for fraud by the Manhattan DA and the New York AG. The president and his family are being investigated for fraud by the Manhattan DA and the New York AG. The president and his family are being investigated for fraud by the Manha Well, yes. That's the sine qua non for being a judge. If she wasn't prepared to do that, she shouldn't even be in her current post Where are the missing ACB Documents the corruptGOP refuse to turn over?
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »