California Supreme Court to hear appeal seeking to overturn new rooftop solar rules

  • 📰 mercnews
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 46 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 22%
  • Publisher: 68%

United States Headlines News

United States Latest News,United States Headlines

Environmental groups say the California Public Utilities Commission made the wrong call on its NEM 3 decision.

Wearing a safety tether, a SunPower worker attaches wiring to a newly installed solar panel at a KB Home development in Riverside County. A trio of environmental groups opposed to recent changes to the rules affecting the 1.8 million Californians who have installed rooftop solar on their homes and businesses will get their day before the state Supreme Court.

The case is not expected to be heard for a few months, since briefs from each side must be submitted to the court and a date on the docket is still to be determined. Arguments will be made before the seven justices of theto approve a third iteration of the state’s net energy metering program, colloquially called NEM 3. The new rules went into effect in mid-April 2023.

Since solar systems can run into the tens of thousands of dollars, opponents of NEM 3 say the changes will extend a new customer’s payback period — the point where the amount of money they save in lower bills matches or exceeds the amount of money they spent to buy the system. “The obvious one is did the Public Utilities Commission consider all of the right costs, all of the right benefits of rooftop solar,” Lin said, “and did the PUC create a specific alternative that was good enough for disadvantaged communities.”

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 88. in US

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Supreme Court Refuses to Hear Environmental Attorney's CaseEnvironmental attorney Steven Donziger's case regarding the appointment of three special prosecutors after being charged with criminal contempt of court is refused by the U.S. Supreme Court, with two conservative judges dissenting. The decision is seen as siding with oil giant Chevron and denying Donziger a hearing of his appeal.
Source: commondreams - 🏆 530. / 51 Read more »

California Supreme Court to hear appeal seeking to overturn new rooftop solar rulesCalifornia Supreme Court to hear appeal seeking to overturn new rooftop solar rules. Environmental groups say the California Public Utilities Commission made the wrong call when it passed its NEM 3 decision
Source: sdut - 🏆 5. / 95 Read more »

California Supreme Court Denies Chula Vista's Request to Review Drone Footage RulingThe California Supreme Court has denied Chula Vista's request to review a lower court ruling that could make the city's Police Department release some of its drone footage to the public.
Source: sdut - 🏆 5. / 95 Read more »

Northern California man wins development impact fees case against U.S. Supreme CourtA Northern California man took his case over development impact fees up to the U.S. Supreme Court and won in a unanimous vote after a 7.5-year battle.
Source: KPIXtv - 🏆 443. / 53 Read more »

Builders may challenge California's development 'impact fees,' Supreme Court rulesThe Supreme Court says home builders in California may challenge the fees commonly imposed by cities and counties to pay for new infrastructure.
Source: L.A. Times Health - 🏆 364. / 59 Read more »

Supreme Court Case Divides California Governor and ProgressivesAn upcoming Supreme Court case has divided Democratic California Governor Gavin Newsom and progressives. The case from Oregon centers on whether homeless people have the right to sleep outside. Grants Pass—the small city of roughly 40,000 people—was sued by the homeless who argued that the city unlawfully punished them for sleeping on the streets when no other shelter is available and unlawfully banned the use of sleeping bags, blankets, pillows and even cardboard boxes in public spaces.
Source: Newsweek - 🏆 468. / 52 Read more »