Rudy Giuliani
I think she'd was a set up from the Republicans against Clinton
MonicaLewinsky Really is a beautiful woman!
Naturally 😜
. . . MonicaLewinsky has a point . . . Sidebar: [Strange that Republicans did impeach BillClinton over a lie to protect his family from an affair w/no NationalSecurity harm and SenateRepublicans still had 3 Live Witnesses.] TrumpIsANationalSecurityThreat=SuperBowlLIV AD👽
Wow! Monica and Tramp?!!!
Yes, when there is a lack of evidence or witnesses it's the fault of the jury.🤷♂️
The person who had an affair and nearly got Bill Clinton impeached and nearly broke a family up, what a great piece independent!😂😂😂😂😂🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
🤔🤔🤔🤔IMPEACHMENTabrogated
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
United Kingdom Latest News, United Kingdom Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Trump impeachment: Acquittal in sight as Senate votes to reject calls for witnessesThe Senate narrowly rejects Democratic demands to summon witnesses for President Donald Trump's impeachment trial. 🇺🇸 It's not real acquittal because sham, rigged presentation by bribed, blackmailed and fooled SenateGOP with NO WITNESSES makes it rigged. Just like how he wants to cheat in next election. TheBeatWithAri andersoncooper FOXTV All100Senators AP washingtonpost BBCWorld
Source: SkyNews - 🏆 35. / 67 Read more »
Trump's acquittal almost certain as senate votes not to call witnessesThe Senate will not hear from witnesses in Donald Trump's impeachment trial, following a 51-49 vote on a motion that would allow senators to subpoena witness testimony and additional documents. CoverUpGOP It would be interesting if there are Repub senators who will not acquit but did not want the trial to continue...
Source: The Independent - 🏆 80. / 59 Read more »
'A grand tragedy': Senate votes against calling witnesses in Trump impeachment trial – videoThe US Senate has voted against calling witnesses and collecting new evidence in the impeachment trial of Donald Trump, clearing the way for a near-certain acquittal Are you part of the fakenews that is here in the USA? PS Happy BrexitDay The circus needs to end. What a precedent the dems are making. Revenge is a dish best served cold, they say. Karma will come back to haunt the dems. A Grand old opra. The people are tired of nothing getting Done, So they vote in a boxer, president trump. Democrats act like Littel Children want except the results. Now some loyal to the Democratic party, act like Littel Children, want leave Dady Alone.
Source: The Guardian - 🏆 84. / 53 Read more »
Senators vote against hearing witnesses in Trump impeachment trialSenate voted 51-49 to block witnesses, with Republicans Mitt Romney and Susan Collins joining Democrats RIP CONGRESS Of course they fucking did. RIP GOP
Source: The Guardian - 🏆 84. / 53 Read more »
Trump impeachment trial: potential swing senator says he will not support witnesses – liveRepublicans seem increasingly confident they can block witnesses as Schiff suggests limiting depositions to a week I say NoStateOfTheUnion for Trump, as the Republicans have shown there is no union amongst us now. Why more witness when Nancy pelosy and her Co traveler's brought overwhelming and uncontestable evidence before the Senate? Will The Senate do their job for them? infact what this guy's brought to the Senate was overwhelming hatred and anger for their lost of 2016 election. Gee, another old, white man screwing everyone over. Shocker. Alexander is a disgrace. His family will never outrun the taint.
Source: The Guardian - 🏆 84. / 53 Read more »
Trump impeachment trial: Mitt Romney to vote for witnesses – liveSpokesperson confirms Republican ‘wants to hear from Bolton’ as Bernie Sanders and Joe Biden tie in national poll Bye bye you are done Orange man impeachment trial: Mitt Romney to vote for these dudes I know – live Whether you are for Trump, or against, the idea of a 'fair trial' without witnesses and evidence is incongruous with itself. It means if he 'wins' that the 'other side' will get to shout out that the trial was a sham. It won't solve anything for either side.
Source: The Guardian - 🏆 84. / 53 Read more »