Fears of another Grenfell-type fire are stunting the spread of wood-based buildings in the UK.
And in Norway a new “ply-scraper” stretches fully 18 storeys – that’s the height recently deemed safe by standards authorities in North America.Members of the timber trade say the Government in England has misunderstood the science behind timber construction. In a consultation ending on Monday, ministers propose the height of timber-based flats, hotels, and boarding houses should be limited to 11 metres – that’s 3-4 storeys.This further tightens rules introduced after the Grenfell disaster, following representation from fire authorities.
“Even with the current guidelines introduced after Grenfell there has been a chilling effect on the industry. People commissioning buildings think ‘I’d better not use timber’. The market has virtually dried up.”, found that a global boom in wood buildings could lock in up to 700 million tons of carbon a year.
"If we engineer the wood into modern building materials and smartly manage harvest and construction, we humans can build ourselves a safe home on Earth.”
The construction industry claims bio-based materials can in fact be more safe in fires than steel structures. Eg see below (straw is not best example for high-rises, but straw is perceived to be even much more fire prone)
The construction principles aren't at fault. What is the problem is the quality of materials used and workmanship in building them!
Spinkler systems can be specified that would reduce and contain the spread of fire internally. There could even be some argument / benefit from external systems as well in window apertures.
Aren’t they called sheds
Now a days all buildings r wood frames as it’s cheap. Plus building high rise is easier & did soundproofing as it’s only for Joe public!
There is certainly a need to educate people.
United Kingdom Latest News, United Kingdom Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: BBCNews - 🏆 3. / 97 Read more »
Source: SkyNews - 🏆 35. / 67 Read more »
Source: The Independent - 🏆 80. / 59 Read more »
Source: The Mirror - 🏆 136. / 51 Read more »
Source: The Independent - 🏆 80. / 59 Read more »
Source: The Guardian - 🏆 84. / 53 Read more »