Boris JohnsonThe prime minister claims the suspension of Parliament was a routine decision taken in order to put forward his new legislative agenda and come back with a Queen’s speech.– meaning .Courts in England and Scotland have returned clashing rulings about whether the prorogation was legal, which means the Supreme Court must give the final judgement.
Lord Pannick added that it was a ‘remarkable feature’ of the proceedings that Mr Johnson has not provided a statement explaining why he advised the Queen to suspend Parliament for the ‘exceptionally long period’. It comes after the High Court in London dismissed Mrs Miller’s case, finding that the length of the prorogation was ‘purely political’ and not a matter for the courts.In Edinburgh, however, the Court of Session concluded Mr Johnson’s decision was unlawful because it was ‘motivated by the improper purpose’ of frustrating Parliament.
they had three years - bullocks.
3 yrs not enough 😂😂
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
United Kingdom Latest News, United Kingdom Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Supreme Court challenge over PM's Parliament suspension - BBC News“We are not concerned with the wider political issues which form the context for this legal issue” The UK Supreme Court begins hearing the two appeals over Parliament’s suspension, making clear the hearings are not about Brexit Don’t take all day, the answer obvious . No BBCPolitics But the whole basis of the case is about Remaining in the EU. If they wanted to leave they would have voted for a deal. Irrelevant case as it’s on the basis of one political view over another political view! If they want to change it, hold an election! simples BBCPolitics It is about Brexit though. That's the whole point. It is obvious parliament has been prorogued because of Brexit. Ignoring that means the prorogation was lawful. Oh well. Kinda guessed this would be the case, but I still thought our law worked on a case by case basis?
Source: BBCNews - 🏆 3. / 97 Read more »
Brexit latest news: Lord Chancellor refuses to rule out second prorogation ahead of Supreme Court hearingThe Lord Chancellor has refused to rule out the possibility that Boris Johnson could prorogue Parliament for a second time, just hours before a landmark Supreme Court hearing begins.
Source: The Telegraph - 🏆 41. / 63 Read more »
Brexit latest news: Boris accused of 'improper' prorogation on first day of Supreme Court hearingBoris Johnson has been accused of proroguing Parliament for political reasons with an "improper motive" at the opening of a Supreme Court Case today.
Source: The Telegraph - 🏆 41. / 63 Read more »
Boris Johnson saw parliament as 'obstacle' to his Brexit plans, Supreme Court hearsThe Supreme Court has been adjourned for today. Tomorrow's session will start at 10:30, with evidence from Sir James Eadie, who is representing the UK government and will talk about the Miller case. Read more here 👉
Source: SkyNews - 🏆 35. / 67 Read more »
Boris Johnson holds breath as Brexit prorogation row hits Supreme Court - latestTHE SUPREME COURT will today begin considering whether Boris Johnson broke the law by suspending Parliament in the run up to Brexit.
Source: Daily Express - 🏆 26. / 68 Read more »
Could the Supreme Court overrule the government?Tomorrow, the UK Supreme Court will consider whether Boris Johnson's decision to suspend Parliament for five weeks was legal But, what is the Supreme Court? A Court that is Supreme to others. It don't see any MP's protesting at parliament.... They are all too busy enjoy their party conferences. Great you're explaining this. But also a damning indictment on the UK education system that you need to. BringBackCivicsEd SupremeCourt Prorogue
Source: BBCNews - 🏆 3. / 97 Read more »