Assange's U.S. Extradition Appeal Wins First Stage

“Make no mistake, we won today in court,” Assange’s fiancée, Stella Moris, said outside the courthouse

1/24/2022 6:33:00 PM

“Make no mistake, we won today in court,” Assange’s fiancée, Stella Moris, said outside the courthouse

Assange, 50, has been held at the high-security Belmarsh Prison since 2019, when he was arrested for skipping bail.

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange on Monday won the first stage of his effort to overturn a U.K. ruling that opened the door for his extradition to U.S. to stand trial on espionage charges.The High Court in London gave Assange permission to appeal the case to the U.K. Supreme Court. But the Supreme Court must agree to accept the case before it can move forward.

“Make no mistake, we won today in court,” Assange’s fiancée, Stella Moris, said outside the courthouse, noting that he remains in custody at Belmarsh Prison in London.“We will fight this until Julian is free,” she added.The Supreme Court normally takes about eight sitting weeks after an application is submitted to decide whether to accept an appeal, the court says on its website.

Read more: TIME »

Mia Mottley: The 100 Most Influential People of 2022

Find out why Mia Mottley is on this year’s list Read more >>

Julian Assange wins first stage of legal battle to avoid extradition to USBREAKING: WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has won the first stage of his bid to appeal against the decision to extradite him to the United States. Democracy, justice and HMRC now depend on whistleblowers. Whistleblower protection is what is required! FreeSpeech FreeJulianAssange Free him. What a horrible country US-UK is.

49ers & Bengals claim play-off upsetsThe San Francisco 49ers and Cincinnati Bengals are one win from Super Bowl 56 after each kicked game-winning field goals in the NFL play-offs. Aaron Rodgers chokes again not interested in yank sport wheres our bloody game m8 В. ГАЙФУЛЛИН, ШОЙГУ:РУССКИЯ АРМИЯ-ЭТО ЦЫГАНСКИЙ ТАБОР

'We did it, finally' - Ryding wins gold in alpine skiingDave Ryding wins Britain's first alpine skiing World Cup gold medal with victory in the Kitzbuhel Slalom. BBCSport Personality of the Year 2022?

Skier Dave Ryding makes history to win Britain's first gold in alpine skiing World CupRyding, 35, has previously finished on the podium twice before. His previous best at the event was second place in 2017. Jesus diz, meu sangue é para perdoar 1° Jo 1:7 Salvação é o amor de servir o faminto o nu o doente em Mt 25:34 com o dízimo de cada 3 anos de Dt 26:12 E ceiar nos 7 dias da páscoa de Êx 12:15 e At 20:7 a 11 O ímpio no inferno em Mt 25:41 e Ez 16:49 sem amor pede bens Gold, maybe win?

The Life-Changing Practice That Will Help You Feel Gratitude'Logging acts of kindness reminds me of what’s gotten me this far, and of what’s possible to do for others,' writes Yohanca Delgado (yodelnyc)

Transgender swimmer Lia Thomas wins the 100m and 200m freestyle racesTransgender swimmer wins the 100m AND 200m freestyle races after USA Swimming said it would release 'new policy' on whether 'elite trans athletes' will still be able to compete against biological women no fair Its very wrong! He is not a woman! He is a man!

January 24, 2022 10:15 AM EST W ikiLeaks founder Julian Assange on Monday won the first stage of his effort to overturn a U.K. ruling that opened the door for his extradition to U.S. to stand trial on espionage charges. The High Court in London gave Assange permission to appeal the case to the U.K. Supreme Court. But the Supreme Court must agree to accept the case before it can move forward. “Make no mistake, we won today in court,” Assange’s fiancée, Stella Moris, said outside the courthouse, noting that he remains in custody at Belmarsh Prison in London. “We will fight this until Julian is free,” she added. The Supreme Court normally takes about eight sitting weeks after an application is submitted to decide whether to accept an appeal, the court says on its website. The decision is the latest step in Assange’s long battle to avoid a trial in the U.S. on a series of charges related to WikiLeaks’ publication of classified documents more than a decade ago. Just over a year ago, a district court judge in London rejected a U.S. extradition request on the grounds that Assange was likely to kill himself if held under harsh U.S. prison conditions. U.S. authorities later provided assurances that the WikiLeaks founder wouldn’t face the severe treatment his lawyers said would put his physical and mental health at risk. The High Court last month the lower court’s decision, saying that the U.S. promises were enough to guarantee Assange would be treated humanely. Those assurances were the focus of Monday’s ruling by the High Court. Assange’s lawyers are seeking to appeal because the U.S. offered its assurances after the lower court made its ruling. But the High Court overturned the lower court ruling, saying that the judge should have given the U.S. the opportunity to offer the assurances before she made her final ruling. The High Court gave Assange permission to appeal so the Supreme Court can decide “in what circumstances can an appellate court receive assurances from a requesting state … in extradition proceedings.” Assange’s lawyers have argued that the U.S. government’s pledge that Assange won’t be subjected to extreme conditions is meaningless because it’s conditional and could be changed at the discretion of American authorities. The U.S. has asked British authorities to extradite Assange so he can stand trial on 17 charges of espionage and one charge of computer misuse linked to WikiLeaks’ publication of thousands of leaked military and diplomatic documents. Assange, 50, has been held at the high-security Belmarsh Prison since 2019, when he was arrested for skipping bail during a separate legal battle. Before that, he spent seven years holed up inside Ecuador’s Embassy in London. Assange sought protection in the embassy in 2012 to avoid extradition to Sweden to face allegations of rape and sexual assault. Sweden dropped the sex crimes investigations in November 2019 because so much time had elapsed. American prosecutors say Assange unlawfully helped U.S. Army intelligence analyst Chelsea Manning steal classified diplomatic cables and military files that WikiLeaks later published, putting lives at risk. Lawyers for Assange argue that their client shouldn’t have been charged because he was acting as a journalist and is protected by the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution that guarantees freedom of the press. They say the documents he published exposed U.S. military wrongdoing in Iraq and Afghanistan. More Must-Read Stories From TIME How