Good architects sometimes do bad things: to wit, two new proposals in and around the Cross. Both mix good intentions with demonstrably bad results. Both are prime examples of the time-honoured architectural style known in technical circles as “big dog tupping a small dog”.
The Cross, jumbled across its baroque peninsula, has a history every bit as winding and intricate as its topography. Built in the 1920s and 30s, for and largely by European immigrants, it quickly became our centre of bohemia. Europeans knew apartment living. They liked the bustle of pedestrian life and the delights of urbanism. A 1912 statutoryThe result is like nowhere else.
A decade later, heading out on a brilliant Sydney morning from one of those low-rent, bad-plumbing red-brick walk-ups, I came face-to-face with just how whitebread I was. In skinny shoebox cafes old Italian men nursed short blacks beneath desultory foreign conversation while, out on the street, locals still strung-out and panda-eyed from the night before partied frailly on. For none of them did I even exist. At last, I felt, I was somewhere real.
Australia Latest News, Australia Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: SkyNewsAust - 🏆 7. / 78 Read more »
Source: SkyNewsAust - 🏆 7. / 78 Read more »
Source: NRL - 🏆 19. / 59 Read more »
Source: abcnews - 🏆 5. / 83 Read more »
Source: abcnews - 🏆 5. / 83 Read more »