being fought to make property more affordable for first-home buyers by giving them access to their superannuation for a house deposit.A feverish property market recovery has resulted in forecasts for house prices to rise 14-15 per cent over the next two years in our major capital cities.
“The young couple who win the auction end up paying more, have less super and probably a bigger mortgage.“ Right now, the investor couple often wins the auction hands down. However, armed with cash from their super, the playing field would tilt back towards the first-home buyers. The opposition’s proposed alternative – getting rid of stamp duty on property – is important for other reasons and might make housing more affordable. However, it does nothing to tip that balance between first-timers and investors.
Can I use my super to by my first home tho?
Interesting. But if you are in a bidding war then you’ve already lost. Secret is disallow auctions if you want to keep housing at a reasonable price. You’ll never win a bidding war against foreign investment!
Capital gain far outstrips superannuation!
No.
To level playing fielding, government should make home buyers' interest payment tax deductible, same as investors. Investors are more competitive at auction because they have rental income and negative gearing.
If you’re selling to someone who tapped their super then it’s a good idea.
Interesting. Housing is used as a bond for nursing homes when owner gets older. Then if house has to be sold then proceeds used to fund nursing home or rent used to fund nursing home. So using super to buy a house is helping gov have cheaper costs funding older ppl later.
House? yes. apartment units? hell no
Definitely not but some people are too desperate to understand this. Also, we do have the FHSS scheme in Australia. Aus does a lot to help first home buyers.
No, but many will
No. But tapping it to buy Bitcoin then selling it later to buy a better home is
I’m not so sure about this. 1st due to the actual costs/amount available & 2nd due to the PM saying that the pension isn’t guaranteed which suggests that people may end up selling their houses to live in retirement
Never should have been allowed. Some people can't even get their super if they have terminal cancer. Spoilt rotten generation.
Hell no
What the public thinks is a moot point. It depends on whether or not the govt thinks it will push prices higher. They are already leaving the burden of deficits to future generations so why not add old age pension shortfalls.
Presents a false choice between super and housing; coming down on the side of using super to 'help' first home buyers vs investors. When you could have both super and housing by taking away the 'stacked deck' favouring the investor. Negative Gearing and CGT concession.
Id love to access my super for a house and house only
yeah nah its not a good idea
Yes.
just stop it
Why are they flogging a lie
How is handing over my retirement savings to people who are already in the property market a good idea?
No.
No
No need to read the article. Yes. You’re welcome.
A morning AND an evening edition? MY ACCURATE REPLY STILL STANDS. LNP, PLEASE STOP TRYING TO RAAPE POOR PEOPLE'S SUPER.
Australia Latest News, Australia Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: smh - 🏆 6. / 80 Read more »
Source: smh - 🏆 6. / 80 Read more »
Source: abcnews - 🏆 5. / 83 Read more »
Source: theage - 🏆 8. / 77 Read more »
Source: newscomauHQ - 🏆 9. / 77 Read more »