‘Class war’ argument on super could ‘backfire’ and lead to negative consequences

  • 📰 SkyNewsAust
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 6 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 6%
  • Publisher: 78%

Australia Headlines News

Australia Latest News,Australia Headlines

The Australian Commentator Chris Mitchell says running a “class war” argument with superannuation can lead to negative consequences and “backfire”.

“I think one of the potential backfires is that the money moves into other tax

shelters, and we simply lose the money to super,” Mr Mitchell told Sky News host Sharri Mackson.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

Wtf have all the good journalist gone... Anyway how fantastic is it having a brilliant federal LABOR Prime Minister AlboMP and the entire AustralianLabor government... auspol

Everyone knows Super is for the rich & to pay less tax. It's a joke.

Well done Sky arguing the the .5% wealthiest need additional tax breaks - two issues here who introduced these changes and why originally and why? Turns out this foolish change was Howard and Costello entrenching upper class welfare..

Without the working class the Wealthy wouldn't exist.💯

Oh thats a new slant on it. “I think one of the potential backfires is that the money moves into other tax shelters, and we simply lose the money to super,” Well, we need more 'conversations' on plugging those holes too. This last one was a complete disaster for the Murdoch's.

And won’t those woke, virtue signalling rich folk who voted Labor, Greens or steal now be regretting it. Go woke, go broke.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 7. in AU

Australia Latest News, Australia Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

‘Huge news’: Report concludes COVID-19 ‘likely arose from a lab leak’There has been 'huge news' with a classified intelligence report handed to the White House saying the US Energy Department has concluded COVID-19 “likely arose from a lab leak”, says Sky News host Sharri Markson. “We already knew that three workers at the Wuhan Institute of Virology were hospitalised with COVID-like symptoms around October or November 2019,' she said. “My sources tell me the new part is that those scientists were working directly with bat coronaviruses.' Ms Markson said in May 2020 a US laboratory which the Energy Department oversees prepared a “bombshell classified report” making the case COVID-19 may have originated in a Wuhan lab as a result of “synthetic and serial passage gain-of-function biological research”, but this was dismissed at the time. “What's new now is that the officials at the top of the Department of Energy have come to the same conclusion as the experts working for them did nearly three years ago. “There are now two US intelligence agencies that say a lab leak is the most likely cause of the pandemic.” But TheRealPBarry said Sharri doesn't know what she is talking about. 😂 The 'Energy Department' is now the one investigating Covid19? Huh? 😳
Source: SkyNewsAust - 🏆 7. / 78 Read more »

Censoring books ‘robs people’ of the opportunity to ‘have open discussions’Broadcaster and writer Esther Krakue says 'contentious bits' in books are points of discussion and make them 'come alive', with James Bond books now being rewritten to remove racist language. “It's really worrying because if you actually start censoring these books and start taking out bits and hiring sensitivity readers … you rob people of the opportunity to have open discussions about them,” Ms Krakue told Sky News host Andrew Bolt. “If there are contentious bits in a book, that’s a good thing because that’s a point of discussion, that’s what makes these books come alive. “But we’re clearly in an era where there is … an economy for sensitive readers.” Does it REALLY count as 'censorship' if the Ian Fleming Publications, the people who OWN the books, are just releasing new versions of the books? I mean, no one is taking away the books from the people who own them. I don't see it as a big deal at all.
Source: SkyNewsAust - 🏆 7. / 78 Read more »

‘Narcissistic’ to think someone has the ‘right to not be offended’Broadcaster and writer Esther Krakue says it's “completely narcissistic” for anyone to think they “have the right to not be offended” when reading a book. This comes as James Bond books are now being rewritten to remove racist language. They have a right not to be offended just because someone else wants to compel them to be. That sounds the more narcissistic to me, compelling someone to think want you command them to Good point.
Source: SkyNewsAust - 🏆 7. / 78 Read more »

‘Neopronouns are endless’: TikTok user explains ‘spore pronouns’You can now have “spore pronouns” as regular pronouns are “a bit boring”, says Sky News host Rita Panahi. In a video a TikTok user says people can use spore pronouns if they have already tried using “he/ze/it pronouns” or if they feel a strong relationship with nature. “Now you’ve got neopronouns, and they’re endless,” Ms Panahi said. So apparently what one rando on TikTok does is news? Each day another special person appears that makes my head spin. WTF?
Source: SkyNewsAust - 🏆 7. / 78 Read more »

Children’s books ‘don’t have to be re-written’: Joe HildebrandSky News Contributor Joe Hildebrand says children's books don’t have to be re-written. Mr Hildebrand’s remarks come after reports emerged suggesting several of Roald Dahl's titles published by Puffin were being amended to remove outdated and offensive language. “Imagine if you went back through history and actually edited everything you found so it met today’s standards?” he told Sky News host Sharri Markson. “I mean Julius Caesar, he committed genocide … so we wouldn’t have any of that.” Sleepy Joe awoke from his 2-week coma to discover somebody called Ronald Dahl was talked about a bit. But all Joe could do was to sit! sit! sit! and he did not like it. not one little bit. The End If you don’t like them m don’t read them . SharriMarkson NO books should be 're-written'! We are living in a '1984' woke nightmare.
Source: SkyNewsAust - 🏆 7. / 78 Read more »

ABC’s coverage of Sydney Mardi Gras didn’t look ‘impartial’The Australian’s Media Writer Sophie Elsworth says the ABC’s coverage of Sydney's Mardi Gras didn’t look “impartial” to her. “I wonder how much they’re spending on this coverage and where’s the impartiality in the coverage?” Ms Elsworth told Sky News host Chris Kenny. “It didn’t look like impartial coverage to me - they were really getting into it; they’re meant to be newsreaders who are impartial, I thought.” Their ABC at it again. Anything But Conservative. Because Catering to Less than 10% Australia is Genius. Only Reason they Rank 3rd is Channel 10 is even worse than TheirABC
Source: SkyNewsAust - 🏆 7. / 78 Read more »