JUDITH FEBRUARY: Busisiwe Mkhwebane, what is this madness?

  • 📰 ewnupdates
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 80 sec. here
  • 3 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 35%
  • Publisher: 53%

South Africa Headlines News

South Africa Latest News,South Africa Headlines

OPINION By inserting herself so obviously into the political game, Busisiwe Mkhwebane may well become hoist by her own petard judith_february

“There are seasons in every country when noise and impudence pass current for worth; and in popular commotions especially, the clamours of interested and factious men are often mistaken for patriotism.” - Publius letter II, Alexander Hamilton, October 1778

In terms of s102 , a President can be removed if there is a motion of no confidence in the President voted upon by a majority of the National Assembly. This means the President and his entire Cabinet of ministers and deputy ministers ‘must resign’. One cannot blame Gordhan for reaching that conclusion given the animus with which the Public Protector appears to be pursuing these matters against him. In addition, in terms of the Public Protector Act, the Public Protector must justify or provide “special circumstances” to entertain any complaints regarding events or conduct that are more than two years old. Mkhwebane has not done so.

This remedial action was strange, to say the least, as was Mkhwebane’s belief that it was even within her power to suggest such economic tinkering. It raised uncomfortable but necessary questions about the Public Protector herself and her integrity. The Gauteng High Court subsequently set aside the findings and ordered a personal costs order against Mkhwebane. Since then she has pursued matters selectively while ignoring investigations of import.

While the law should be allowed to take its course in the interdict and review process, there does seem to be enough in the public domain and her reports to suggest that Mkhwebane is unfit for office and should be removed from her position. This will be a tricky move lest Ramaphosa and his allies within the ANC are seen to be fighting proxy political battles themselves through Mkhwebane’s removal. She has probably made that calculation already given her emboldened stance.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 30. in ZA

South Africa Latest News, South Africa Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

JUDITH FEBRUARY: It's clear Mkhwebane is unfit for officeThe ConCourt ruling painted a picture of a woman who is not only incompetent but who is also dishonest and someone who should not be heading up a constitutional body, says Judith February.
Source: ewnupdates - 🏆 30. / 53 Read more »

JUDITH FEBRUARY: Ramaphosa has tricky waters to navigate
Source: ewnupdates - 🏆 30. / 53 Read more »

Process to remove public protector must be fair, DA and ANC agreeBusisiwe Mkhwebane has indicated that she would challenge a process to remove her in court.
Source: TheCitizen_News - 🏆 6. / 75 Read more »

JUDITH FEBRUARY: It's clear Mkhwebane is unfit for officeThe ConCourt ruling painted a picture of a woman who is not only incompetent but who is also dishonest and someone who should not be heading up a constitutional body, says Judith February.
Source: ewnupdates - 🏆 30. / 53 Read more »

Mkhwebane slams Ramaphosa's lawyers for 'litigation through media''As a constitutional institution, we are here to support and strengthen constitutional democracy. We are not here to be antagonistic towards government.'
Source: TimesLIVE - 🏆 28. / 59 Read more »

Mkhwebane slams Ramaphosa's lawyers for 'litigation through media'Public protector Busisiwe Mkhwebane has accused President Cyril Ramaphosa's lawyers of 'perpetuating unnecessary litigation through the media'.
Source: SowetanLIVE - 🏆 13. / 63 Read more »