The law was challenged in response to raids in inner Johannesburg seemingly targeting illegal immigrants and the highest court has pronounced itself 10 days before an election in which then mayor Herman Mashaba has campaigned on an anti-foreigner ticket.
The law was challenged in response to raids in inner Johannesburg seemingly targeting illegal immigrants and the highest court has pronounced itself 10 days before an election in which then mayor Herman Mashaba has campaigned on an anti-foreigner ticket
declaring section 13(7)(c) of the South African Police Service Act unconstitutional in a victory for residents of derelict buildings in inner Johannesburg who endured humiliating warrantless raids apparently aimed at flushing out illegal foreigners.Section 13(7)(c) authorises warrantless searches of any person, home, vehicle or any receptacle or object of whatever nature in a cordoned-off area, and gives the police wide power to seize objects in the possession of those searched.
“This undoubtedly infringes on the right to privacy as elucidated in section 14(a), (b) and (c) of the Constitution,” the court held, ordering that this part of the Act afforded the authorities powers that exceeded the aim of the public order mandate it envisioned and must be severed.
The court hence concurred with a ruling In July last year, by a full bench of the high court in Johannesburg, that declared warrantless searches of private homes and their inhabitants unconstitutional and gave parliament two years to remedy section 13(7)(c). headtopics.com
Gauteng Judge President Dunstan Mlambo had, in a unanimous judgment, held that the section was overbroad and led to impermissible levels of invasion of a person’s inner sanctum. “The extent of the invasion of the innermost component of the personal right to privacy authorised by S13(7)(c) of the SAPS Act is substantially disproportionate to its public purpose. The section is clearly overbroad in its reach insofar as it also permits warrantless, extensive and intrusive searches of private homes and persons inside them,” he said.
“It is furthermore deficient in failing to guide police officers as to the manner in which searches of private homes and those present in them should be conducted.”The court found that the relevant section went well beyond the prescripts of the Criminal Procedure Act, which stipulates that warrantless searches were allowed where those concerned gave their consent, or the officers conducting such were confident that a court would have issued a warrant but that applying for one would have frustrated the purpose of the search.
The constitutional court ordered that until parliament corrects the law, the provisions of section 21 and 22 of the Criminal Procedure Act be read into the vacuum left by the severed part of section 13(7)(c) to allow the police to conduct searches within the scope of the first Act. Not doing so would rob the police of the power to conduct searches and seizures even where these may be necessary.
After last year’s high court ruling, theSocio-Economic Rights Institute(Seri) had 15 days to approach the constitutional court for an order confirming the invalidity of this section of the Act.The organisation had approached the court on behalf of some 2 852 people inhabiting 11 abandoned buildings in downtown Johannesburg. These included Rosano Modes, Wellington Court, Remington Court, Erven 87 and 88 in Berea and four properties in Davies Street. headtopics.com
They had, between May 2017 and May 2018, endured more than a dozen raids by the police, the Johannesburg Metro Police and officials from the department of home affairs. The raids took place while Herman Mashaba was the mayor of Johannesburg and still with the Democratic Alliance.
As the leader of ActionSA, his campaign for the November 1 local government election has raised concern about its alleged xenophobic overtones. Mashaba was the eighth respondent in the matter.The high court noted that section 13(7)(c) did not differentiate between the types of premises that may be searched, and its language was “so sweeping” that it permits warrantless searches by members of the police into private homes and rifling through intimate possessions.
Both the high court and the constitutional court held that the power of the police to cordon off an area to restore public order was relevant to their constitutional mandate to ensure safety and security. But it was a question, Mlambo said, of how officials exercise this power and the way they went about it if the operations in question had violated the dignity of those involved.
As it happened, the searches were conducted in a manner that humiliated the inhabitants, and seemed designed to encourage them to vacate the premises. Doors were broken down, inhabitants were fingerprinted and those who could not produce documentation showing that they were lawfully resident in South Africa were arrested. headtopics.com
Seri asked the court to declare section 13(7) in its entirety invalid, but did not succeed in this regard. It begged leave of the constitutional court to appeal this part of the high court ruling, but the court on Friday held that sections 13(7) (a) and (b) were valid, in that they did not infringe on the right to privacy.
These extend the power to the police to cordon off areas for the purpose of maintaining public order, and the majority judgment held that this did not imply warrantless searches be carried, and therefore the section was not rendered inchoate by the removal of section 13(7)(c).
Specifically, section 13(7)(a) gives the police commissioner the power to provide written authorisation to cordon off an area where it is reasonable in the circumstances to restore public order or safety. Section 13(7)(b) specifies what must be included in the written authorisation.
“Neither of these two paragraphs limits or infringes any constitutional rights,” the constitutional court said.Vote for an informed choiceWe’re dropping the paywall this week so that everyone can access all our stories for free, and access the information they need in the run up to the local government elections. To follow the news, sign up to our
daily elections newsletterfor the latest updates and analysis. Read more: Mail & Guardian »
LIVESTREAM | Eskom provides update on system challenges
Eskom CEO Andre de Ruyter is back with an update on the grid.
What were the people who drafted this rubbish in 94 thinking? Then we don’t have a country. The people occupying those buildings have no authority. So the constitution covers them and the owners can’t claim their properties. Laws are meaningless when the people enforcing those laws are the perpetrators
This is hogwash judgement like many others that the con court has made. Let's stop glorifying gabage rullings. For all those who are new to this working from home Bitcoin trading options Here's a little tip: Get a trusted Bitcoin expert and stick to him ArnoldHarry38 Invest and play at similar times each day. Because : In times of chaos, your investment is your anchor to success⚖️
So what the court is saying is that forefiners can do as the please in south Africa,because most of hijacked buildings are taken by foreigners. They should raid the inner City if there are illegal immigrants there they should be targeted nothing wrong with that or is it illegal in South Africa meaning something else? Deport anything illegal.
What has the M&G has been up to? - The Mail & GuardianRon Derby, the twelfth editor of the Mail & Guardian makes some long overdue introductions – and picks his favourite child. I wish I contacted earlier LindaStouffes this year I'm sharing this to encourage every beginner and Bitcoin lover to get in touch with her she is very legit and God fearing person LindaStouffes My encounter with Geoffreypreud actually change my life and for that I'll keep upgrading people for his good job thanks once again Geoffrey But be oprn minded dont be like Kodak that misses the opportunity to change fast and capture new generation technology because old generation passes going online fully will make the M&G the leading , try to focus more in economic and business and explaining the constitution more
Fishing subsidies in the W. Cape: ‘Illegal fishing is our only option’ - The Mail & GuardianFishing subsidies in the W. Cape: ‘Illegal fishing is our only option’ - Fishers claim they are forced into illegal trawling because subsidies only benefit big vessels 𝙏𝙝𝙞𝙨 𝙬𝙤𝙢𝙖𝙣 𝙘𝙝𝙖𝙣𝙜𝙚𝙙 𝙢𝙮 𝙨𝙩𝙤𝙧𝙮. 𝙈𝙮 𝙛𝙧𝙞𝙚𝙣𝙙 𝙘𝙤𝙣𝙣𝙚𝙘𝙩𝙚𝙙 𝙢𝙚 𝙩𝙤 𝙝𝙚𝙧, 𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙥𝙡𝙖𝙩𝙛𝙤𝙧𝙢 𝙞𝙨 𝙫𝙚𝙧𝙮 𝙨𝙪𝙧𝙚 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙚𝙖𝙨𝙮 𝙩𝙤 𝙖𝙘𝙘𝙚𝙨𝙨, 𝙞𝙛 𝙮𝙤𝙪 𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙡𝙡𝙮 𝙬𝙖𝙣𝙩 𝙩𝙤 𝙩𝙧𝙖𝙙𝙚, 𝙘𝙤𝙣𝙩𝙖𝙘𝙩 WithKatherine64 it cannot be the only option lawandordersa growsa grow
Excavating the role of Africans in the creation of the modern world - The Mail & GuardianExcavating the role of Africans in the creation of the modern world - Europe would have been a marginal player in world history without the continent’s natural resources and centuries of cheap African labour Oh just more woke BS..
‘No one is campaigning to us’ — Vuwani residents on municipal elections - The Mail & Guardian‘No one is campaigning to us’ — Vuwani residents on municipal elections - Vuwani residents are ready to vote, but none of the top three parties is wooing them I wish I contacted earlier LindaStouffes this year I'm sharing this to encourage every beginner and Bitcoin lover to get in touch with her she is very legit and God fearing person LindaStouffes 'Smaller' parties will get better in governance if given the opportunity. Maybe it is time for that experiment to happen here. Vuwani must not think it is the only village in South Africa. There are thousands of villages who are in the same situation. It is their right to ask why but it is not entitlement.
Phoenix activist takes on Durban's politically connected in November polls - The Mail & GuardianPhoenix activist takes on Durban’s politically connected in November polls - Independent candidates look set to play a greater role in the metro municipality after 1 November I love this post The size of the experiment should have been limited in proportion to the risks-adjusted potential of the opportunity, Geoffreypreud I can wining and learning because my payment of $45,000 has just arrived
Why handing over ICC suspects could help Sudan’s transition - The Mail & GuardianWhy handing over ICC suspects could help Sudan’s transition - A failed coup in September, weeks of brinkmanship, and a looming crisis in eastern Sudan have laid bare tensions between civilians and military leaders