In a report inwhich Mkhwebane made an adverse finding against Ramaphosa, she found that the president had lied to Parliament when he responded to a question on a R500 000 donation made to his 2017 ANC presidency campaign by the controversial Bosasa group.The EFF motivated for the unsealing of the documents, which include financial statements reflecting payments made to the CR17 campaign.
In March last year, a full bench of the high court – which included Judge President Dunstan Mlambo, judges Keoagile Matojane and Raylene Keightley – reviewed, declared invalid and set aside Mkhwebane’s decision to investigate and report on the CR17 election campaign. In an affidavit dated July 27, 2020 and filed by Ramaphosa’s lawyer, Peter Harris of Harris Nupen Molebatsi Attorneys, the president stated that the issues amaBhungane seek to ventilate in the apex court were not decided at the high court because the centre elected not to enter into the debate regarding the proper interpretation of the Executive Ethics Code.
He told the court amaBhungane were wrong to claim that the high court found that the Ethics Code did not require the disclosure of donations made to intra-party campaigns such as the CR17 campaign.
the_smme Imagine if he was to be found guilty 😳but then the Concourt will never rule that.
It is really hard finding a legit online platform with a real manager like Jeff_Arnhoff who will show you how to invest by yourself and withdraw at will thank you zeshhyibes2 for reffering me, I'm grateful. Please guys don't neglect this opportunity
Whatever they say will show who this ConCourt really stands for.
The Ruling will further exacerbate tenison in the country will also add to the visible divisions among citizens and fuel the necessity for a Civil war, It's clear that the first victims will be Black people some will fight against the whites some for the whites. Kubi Vuka Darkie!
Now I believe what people are saying about Trader_Mark1 trade is true, you are indeed a man of your words, you have changed lives including mine,thanks for you kindness
Judging from the comments, under this Ramaphosa guy, people have lost faith in this captured judiciary. This is not good, and all 3 arms of State have been captured! ThugsInRobes StellenboschMafia CR17BankStatements
Concourt will favor Cyril it's a known fact
We knew the ruling on Zuma and know the ruling on Cyril. Their days are numbered though
The judgement will only go one way.
Why bother though...
Captured judiciary 🥴🥴🥴
Why bother mos we all know the outcome Who needs the Judiciary when you have Stellenbosch🙄🤷♂️
Not guilty. The state will be ordered to pay for silili representative.
Unseal the documents finish and klaar.
Obvious!
You all know the judgment already.
ConCourtSA Dont bother! We know the outcome
Let me guess it will be set aside or even postponed Mxwi!!
Lol they'll rule Mmasechaba... They'll make it about her, not about Mthengisi
They still call it a judgment.🤣
Can he also go for 6 months
Is this even necessary? I can pass that judgment myself right here and now...
The Concourt is seized with Presidential matters this week,that will be an even more profound judgment either way,come Thursday.
Case is dismissed with cost
on the roll
If he doesn't have the judges in his pocket then his president game is weak...
A useless matter
O kae Agrizzi bafwethu?
POPAI just came into effect.😏 Now go to rest.
Tomorrow the RETFaction will be out in full force. Cleanse your tls, people.🤭
We already know the outcome
Why bother?
South Africa Latest News, South Africa Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: TheCitizen_News - 🏆 6. / 75 Read more »
Source: TheCitizen_News - 🏆 6. / 75 Read more »
Jacob Zuma’s own comments about the judiciary have come back to haunt himFormer president JacobZuma’s defiance of the statecaptureinquiry, and his outright attacks on the judiciary, will cost him just over a year of his freedom after today’s ConCourt judgment. Heh heh . Not cackling now He will play the victim, comparing himself to Nelson Mandela to gain support He was misled by his legal team. Their arguments did not make any substance. They made him believe that the commission was going to convict him. Instead only what he was asked for was to present his case as the former head of state. No one was convicted for testifying
Source: IOL - 🏆 46. / 51 Read more »
EDITORIAL | Zuma’s sentence sends a powerful message to SA and political ‘untouchables’The ConCourt’s judgment is a timely reminder that the rule of law applies to everyone ‘without fear or favour’ Comes a time where we will see the current president going the same root. No it doesn't it was going to be good if they did the same thing to botha when he refused totally to go to truth commission, but instead he was given SUSPENDED sentence NXA
Source: TimesLIVE - 🏆 28. / 59 Read more »
Jacob Zuma’s own comments about the judiciary have come back to haunt himICYMI: Former president Jacob Zuma’s defiance of the commission of inquiry probing high-level corruption during his time in office, and his outright attacks on the judiciary, will cost him just over a year of his freedom. But he is not gonna spend a year in jail,this is misleading
Source: IOL - 🏆 46. / 51 Read more »
Source: TheCitizen_News - 🏆 6. / 75 Read more »