Would Republicans Follow Their Garland Rule for the Court in 2020?

WASHINGTON — When Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg was released from the hospital last weekend after another in a string of health scares, blue America breathed a sigh of relief. Only one more month, many whispered, until the start of a presidential election year when filling a vacancy on the Supreme Court would be off limits in the Senate.That was the case in 2016 when Senate Republicans stonewalled President Barack Obama’s nomination of Judge Merrick B.

“My standard on the nomination of Supreme Court nominees remains the same,” she said. “As long as the president is in office, he has the constitutional right to nominate. I thought that Merrick Garland should have had a hearing and a vote. Now obviously, senators could have voted against him based on the timing. But to block the nomination from proceeding at all, I thought was wrong.”

Democrats remain angry over the treatment of both Obama and Garland and expect Republicans to move aggressively if the chance arose for Trump to place a third nominee on the court. Should any nominee replace one of the four justices picked by Democratic presidents, it would cement a commanding 6-3 conservative majority on the high court, and the lure of that lineup would probably prove irresistible to Republicans.

Should Republicans remain united, however, there is little that Democrats could do to impede a nomination, because a series of rules changes has neutered the filibuster when it comes to judicial picks, meaning the majority party can push through the president’s choice without a single vote from the minority.

Coons said his preference would be that the conflict be avoided altogether and no vacancy arose. If one did, the fight would no doubt spill over into the presidential and congressional elections. It could also give momentum to calls by some Democratic presidential contenders and advocacy groups to reconfigure the court to offset what they see as an illegitimate conservative imbalance — building support for ideas that have not yet been embraced by the party mainstream.

Hell no.

No. Mitch already said he would take up a vote if it would happen.

Of course not. This is not a lame duck session like when Garland was nominated.

Nope, nor should they. Harry Reid set new rules, live by them. Pelosi and Schiff set new rules, they will need to live by in the future.

Hell No

Fat chance! They’re lying, scheming, scamming, unpatriotic hypocrites who will break any and all rules of law and/or propriety (even their own) to cheat and get their way.

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Malta court rejects suspect's complaint over arrests in Daphne murder caseA Maltese court on Saturday rejected a complaint over his arrests by a man who h...
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »

A year in showbiz: court drama, box office records and a young billionaireFrom the world's youngest self-made billionaire to celebrities in court, th... Damn. That Mohammed Salah is a man of many talents.
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »

U.S. Supreme Court to hear its first major gun case since 2010A legal fight over a New York City handgun ordinance that could give the U.S. Supreme Court&39;s conservative majority a chance to expand gun rights goes before the nine justices on Monday in one of the most closely watched cases of their current term. The court is scheduled to hear arguments starting Ayo dipilih... 😎
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »

Gun safety groups brace for Supreme Court moves on 2nd AmendmentFor the first time in nearly a decade, the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday will consider Second Amendment rights in a closely watched case that gun safety advocates worry could set a dangerous new precedent. A dangerous new precedent is an advocate group wanting to infringe on the 2nd Amendment. 'well regulated', it says. Armed forces represent THE PEOPLE, and SHOULD be the only ones PERMITTED to carry guns.
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »

EU rebels fight Commission plan to build WTO court without AmericaAmerica's closest European allies are revolting against Brussels' attempt to build a parallel World Trade Organization court with Russia, China and Brazil but without the U.S.
Source: politico - 🏆 381. / 59 Read more »

Gun safety groups brace for Supreme Court moves on 2nd AmendmentFor the first time in nearly a decade, the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday will consider Second Amendment rights in a closely watched case that gun safety advocates worry could set a dangerous new precedent. The case involves a New York City law that prohibited licensed gun owners from taking their handguns
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »