Wisconsin court to rule on immunity in sex trafficking case

  • 📰 YahooNews
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 26 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 14%
  • Publisher: 59%

United States Headlines News

United States Latest News,United States Headlines

Wisconsin's Supreme Court is set to decide Wednesday whether a sex trafficking victim accused of homicide can argue at trial that she was justified in killing the man who trafficked her.

FILE - Chrystul Kizer sits in the Kenosha County Courthouse on Feb. 6, 2020, in Kenosha, Wis. Wisconsin's Supreme Court is set to decide Wednesday, July 6, 2022, whether Kizer, an alleged sex trafficking victim accused of homicide, can argue at trial that she was justified in killing the man who trafficked her, a ruling that could help define the extent of immunity for trafficking victims nationwide. MADISON, Wis.

Kizer, now 22, contends she met Volar on a sex-trafficking website. She says he sexually assaulted her and sold her to others for sex. She told detectives she shot him after he tried to touch her, according to the criminal complaint.under a 2008 state law that absolves sex trafficking victims of any offenses resulting from being trafficked.

State attorneys asked the Supreme Court to reverse that decision, maintaining that the immunity statutes can't possibly extend to homicide.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

Bewitched9 Why do I feel like this would not be a question if it happened to a man

Why is that even a legal question. Wouldn't that be self defense

Vote out the Republicans who let this happen.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 380. in US

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

What to know about same-sex marriage, contraceptive and other cases Clarence Thomas questionedIn case you need a reminder, here's what to know about the privacy-related precedent...
Source: HoustonChron - 🏆 609. / 51 Read more »

PolitiFact - Contrary to claim, rape never mentioned in Roe v. Wade proceedings and did not form basis of caseThe U.S. Supreme Court did not consider the circumstances of plaintiff Jane Roe’s pregnancy when ruling on the landmark case in 1973. politicfact Q: can you fact check Alito's claim there is no right to privacy? That feels important. Actually years after Roe, McCorvey joined with others in the abortion rights movement. During this time, she stated she had lied about being raped & apologized for making the false rape claim. She said 'I never thought women would use abortions as a form of birth control'.
Source: PolitiFact - 🏆 17. / 71 Read more »

PolitiFact - Contrary to claim, rape never mentioned in Roe v. Wade proceedings and did not form basis of caseThe U.S. Supreme Court did not consider the circumstances of plaintiff Jane Roe’s pregnancy when ruling on the landmark case in 1973. Also didn’t consider federalism The opinion goes into great detail why the court didn't following stare decisis (judicial precedence) and implies that following it is their decision, paving the way to ignore it in future cases or overturn settled cases. Basically allowing them to do whatever they want.
Source: PolitiFact - 🏆 17. / 71 Read more »

Samantha Bee tells people to ‘raise hell’ in response to Supreme Court abortion rulingSamantha Bee told her viewers to 'raise hell' in opposition to the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v Wade and return the abortion issue back to the states.
Source: FoxNews - 🏆 9. / 87 Read more »

Landmark school choice ruling at Supreme Court: A win for parentsIn a major win for parents, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Carson v. Makin recently that Maine’s tuition assistance program could not discriminate against parents who select private religious schools for their children. OpEd DBChirpy Means Maine taxpayers are going to pay more and more. bangordailynews PressHerald I’m sure SenatorCollins is concerned.
Source: WashTimes - 🏆 235. / 63 Read more »

Editorial: The Supreme Court ruling on school prayer deserves a big fat FThe Supreme Court threw out decades of legal precedent on school prayer with a decision that ignored the facts as well as the importance of not proselytizing to students. opinion Pppffftt, wait until 2024 when republicans take everything... One nation under God is going to have a new meaning 😉 opinion opinion
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »