Bopp said he believes at least two justices, Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Brett Kavanaugh, have no desire to be involved in a frontal attack on Roe. The pro-life advocate noted that last December both men appeared to side with the court’s Democratic appointees in declining to hear a case about the rights of states to curtail funding for Planned Parenthood, which provides abortions as well as an array of other health services.
Another obstacle to the Supreme Court considering the new abortion bans anytime soon is the rhythm and pace of the federal court system. Cases typically take months to be decided in a trial court, then proceed to an appeals court, where many more months can pass before a decision is made by a three-judge panel. Sometimes there are efforts to get the full bench of an appeals court to take the case.
“There really isn’t enough time for any of these bans to get to the court in the next term,” Rikelman said. Perhaps the most likely issue for the Supreme Court to take up is a case over a Louisiana law requiring physicians who provide abortions to have admitting privileges at a nearby hospital. In 2016, the court struck down a similar Texas law by a 5-3 vote in a case known as Whole Women’s Health v. Hellerstedt.
Source: Law Daily Report (lawdailyreport.net)
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Supreme Court is not eager to overturn Roe vs. Wade — at least not soonSupreme Court justices have many ways to avoid making sweeping rulings. Chief Justice Roberts has typically resisted moving quickly to decide major controversies or to announce abrupt, far-reaching changes in the law. And why is he flying around with dt in air force one Confused of how someone can tell a woman what to do with her reproductive choices! This is appalling and an attack on human rights AlabamaAbortionBan RoeVWade He's going to be facing increasing pressure to overturn RoevWade...more trips on Air Force 2 coming up?
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »
U.S. Supreme Court tosses ruling against Merck on Fosamax osteoporosis drugSupreme Court rules for Merck on claims it failed to warn about fracture risk from osteoporosis drug Fosamax Uh,oh.., This list could go on and on.... EndBigPharma Reclassify does the same... increase femur fractures.
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »
U.S. anti-abortion groups plot course from state capitals to Supreme CourtAnti-abortion advocacy groups have pushed hard in recent months for the passage ...
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »
Hundreds rally at U.S. Supreme Court, calling state abortion bans as step backwardAbortion-rights campaigners, including Democrats seeking their party's 2020... good, women have the right to chose! there trying to take all our freedom away!☝🏿👽😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘 and Full term abortions in NY are a forward step ? UNGA
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »
Abortion-rights protesters descend on Supreme Court in wake of state bansAn influx of abortion-rights protests are converging on the steps of state capitols, town squares, courthouses across the country and the Supreme Court. Is it fashionable yet to care about living, breathing children dying? Let us know, GOP supporters, when those children matter to you.
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »
2020 Democrats join Supreme Court protest against state abortion bans'Vote them out!' Protestors demonstrated across the country against recently-passed restrictive abortion laws, rallying in front of the Georgia Capitol Building in Atlanta, lining the streets outside City Hall in Philadelphia, and more. 自由的美国 If women cared about literally anything else as much as they care about killing their children in utero, imagine what they could accomplish. They might have even closed the imaginary 'wage gap' by now. I think the progressive bots have failed to identify the reason for these laws. I can sum it up in two words......SCOTUS Showdown!
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »
If Donald Trump gets another Supreme Court pick...Conservatives may not love everything about Donald Trump, but his record of installing federal judges has delighted them I wonder how many abortions she's had. the dogma lives loudly within her We have to make sure he gets no more picks. The corrupt basted shouldn't be nominating any judges.
Source: TheEconomist - 🏆 6. / 92 Read more »
Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch emerges as decisive vote in favor of Native American treaty rightsTwice this term, including in a decision handed down on Monday, Gorsuch has signed onto 5-4 rulings that entrenched the rights of Native American tribes under 19th century treaties. So democrats lost their shit over Gorsuch for nothing. Wow. What’s new? ………..The ONLY people who didn't have to emigrate to America...…...have to fight for their RIGHTS Thank you Justice Gorsuch
Source: CNBC - 🏆 12. / 72 Read more »
U.S. Supreme Court sides with Native American elk hunterThe Supreme Court on Monday ruled in favor of a Native American elk hunter, citi... AWESOME What about the Fine American Tradition of giving Native Americans the shaft at every opportunity 😫 -- Dear Photo Desk: Oops! It's = it is. Its = possessive.
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »
U.S. Supreme Court rejects Iraqi man's torture-related deportation challengeThe U.S. Supreme Court on Monday rejected a bid to avoid deportation by a Christ... Bye
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »