Ever since the advent of popular streaming services in 2013, audiences have seen shows come and go in the blink of an eye; released to great acclaim and popularity, only to be discretely pulled and never seen again. Though platforms have routinely canceled original content for the best part of a decade, this makes sense – if a show or film has an expensive production but isn’t pulling in the numbers, then it is fiscally prudent to cancel it.
SCREENRANT VIDEO OF THE DAY SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT It’s also fairly common knowledge that streamers make limited-time deals with studies. For example, a landmark deal signed by Netflix and Sony in April 2021 meant that all of Sony’s feature films arrive on Netflix in the coveted pay-1 window . Streamers are unlikely to depend that much on their own original content – and this is especially true of Netflix and Amazon Prime.
Streaming Services Save Money By Cutting Content One of the great promises of streaming services was the notion of ephemeral media; access to films and television that wouldn’t physically age, and that would be at the push of a button for as long as the service was around. Yet by 2023, Disney+ has removed its one season of Willow , a sequel series to the popular 1988 film of the same name. Warner Bros. Discovery has done the same with Westworld on its platform Max.
Popular shows go primarily because it’s a quick way for parent streamers to avoid residual payments and licensing fees . Not only that, but poorly-received content on a platform can undermine its popularity and stock value. Consequently, streaming companies have the potential to save tens of millions of dollars if they remove enough content, which can then be better spent on developing more lucrative IP. Warner Bros.
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: MarketWatch - 🏆 3. / 97 Read more »
Source: usweekly - 🏆 390. / 55 Read more »
Source: ADDitudeMag - 🏆 311. / 61 Read more »
Source: MarketWatch - 🏆 3. / 97 Read more »
Source: bbchealth - 🏆 143. / 63 Read more »
Source: MarketWatch - 🏆 3. / 97 Read more »