The much-awaited and consequential Census decision still hasn’t come down, with the current Supreme Court term nearing its end. Photo: Mandel Ngan/AFP/Getty Images When the U.S. Supreme Court added a second day, then a third, this week to release opinions, Court-watchers figured one decision very likely to come down was in Department of Commerce v.
Other than the fundamental fact that SCOTUS takes its own sweet time on everything, the most obvious explanation for delays in this decision is the intervening appearance of new evidence supporting the Census challengers’ contention that the administration’s rationale for the citizenship question is a big fat lie. They argue that the real motive is a desire to reduce minority participation in the Census.
The new evidence bearing on this question arose from the bizarre circumstance of digital files recently discovered by the daughter of the late GOP gerrymandering wizard Thomas Hofeller, suggesting that he had given the administration a bogus voting-rights-enforcement argument for the citizenship question even as he demonstrated its strictly partisan benefits.
Nobody knows how the Court has reacted to this plea or to the underlying new evidence, which a second district court in Maryland has deemed relevant. But the administration is clearly worried, asking SCOTUS just yesterday to help them out, Howe notes:
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Judge in census case: New evidence alleging political motivation behind citizenship question 'raises a substantial issue'In a blow to the Trump administration, a federal trial judge said Wednesday that he believes new evidence presented in a challenge to the 2020 census citizenship question 'raises a substantial issue.' That’s a blow to the American people Not a blow. Just another reason for a Democrat to switch to Republican. How can it be a blow to Trump admin when nothing has been done or actually decided?
Source: CNN - 🏆 4. / 95 Read more »
NPR Choice pageThat judge is a hero! You mean putting it back after Obama took it off right?
Source: NPR - 🏆 96. / 63 Read more »
Asian population outpaces whites in Alameda and Santa Clara countiesCensus data shows that the white population declined in Alameda and Santa Clara counties as the Asian population increased from 2014 to 2018.
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »
Supreme Court allows cross memorial in Maryland to standThe Supreme Court ruled that a cross at a World War I memorial is not a government endorsement of religion and can remain as it is. Pete Williams has details from the court steps. It's a fact of life many people believe in God AS long as Religion is Separate from State It's also a fact that in America laws are made based on religious beliefs Not a good thing Good. There are no church services held there. Everyone but Radicalized democrats know it was erected as a war memorial. It has stood in good standing for damn near a century and now has become part and parcel of where it stands. Maybe lets dig up Bob Byrd from ANC
Source: MSNBC - 🏆 469. / 51 Read more »
Supreme Court rules giant cross to veterans on public land is not gov't endorsement of religionUS Supreme Court says huge concrete cross can stay on public land; rejects claim that its presence is an unconstitutional government endorsement of religion. I have to agree on their ruling... is a tricky one although people are exagerating... the only religious stuff we need to avoid is those pseudo evangelist trying to tell america how to live their life using their version of god and pseudo morals to pocket money Don’t people have better things to do? 🤬
Source: MSNBC - 🏆 469. / 51 Read more »
Supreme Court Rules 40-Foot Cross on Public Land Contains Secular MessageThe Supreme Court decided to let a 40-foot cross remain on a Maryland highway median, concluding that the memorial to World War I’s fallen heros holds a secular meaning and does not violate the constitutional separation of church and state. Excellent decision blogger bloggertemplate bloggerdesign blogspot customization More lies from media democrats people
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »